• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Radiology . Chest CT Findings in Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2: Delta versus Omicron Variants

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Radiology


. 2022 Jun 28;220676.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.220676. Online ahead of print.
Chest CT Findings in Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2: Delta versus Omicron Variants


Soon Ho Yoon[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jong Hyuk Lee[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Baek-Nam Kim[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background CT manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may differ among variants. Purpose To compare the chest CT findings of SARS-CoV-2 between the Delta and Omicron variants. Materials and Methods This retrospective study collected consecutive baseline chest CT images of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 from a secondary referral hospital when the Delta and Omicron variants predominated. Two radiologists categorized CT images based on the Radiological Society of North America classification system for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and visually graded pneumonia extent. Pneumonia, pleural effusion, and intrapulmonary vessels were segmented and quantified on CT images using a priori developed neural networks, followed by reader confirmation. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between the variants and CT category, distribution, severity, and peripheral vascularity. Results In total, 88 patients with the Delta (mean age, 67 years±15; 46 men) and 88 patients with the Omicron (mean age, 62 years±19; 51 men) variants were included. Omicron was associated with a less frequent typical peripheral, bilateral ground-glass opacity (32% [28/88] versus 57% [50/88]; P=.001), more frequent peri-bronchovascular predilection (38% [25/66] versus 7% [5/71]; P<.001), lower visual pneumonia extent (5.4±6.0 versus 7.7±6.6; P=.02), similar pneumonia volume (5%±10 versus 7%±11; P=.14), and a higher proportion of vessels with a cross-sectional area smaller than 5 mm[SUP]2[/SUP] relative to the total pulmonary blood volume (BV5%; 48%±11 versus 44%±8; P=.004). In adjusted analyses, Omicron was associated with a non-typical appearance (odds ratio, 0.34; P=.006), peri-bronchovascular predilection (odds ratio, 9.2; P<.001), and higher BV5% (β value, 3.8; P=.01) but similar visual pneumonia extent (P=.17) and pneumonia volume (P=.67) relative to Delta variant. Conclusions On chest CT, the Omicron SARS-COV-2 variant showed nontypical, peri-bronchovascular pneumonia and less pulmonary vascular involvement than the Delta variant in hospitalized patients with comparable CT disease severity.
 
Back
Top Bottom