• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Quantifying protection against influenza virus infection measured by hemagglutination-inhibition assays in vaccine trials

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Epidemiology. 2015 Oct 1. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Quantifying protection against influenza virus infection measured by hemagglutination-inhibition assays in vaccine trials.[/h] Zhao X[SUP]1[/SUP], Fang VJ, Ohmit SE, Monto AS, Cook AR, Cowling BJ.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Correlations between hemagglutination-inhibition titers (hereafter 'titers') and protection against infection have been identified in historical studies. However, limited information is available about the dynamics of how titer influences protection.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Titers were measured in randomized, placebo-controlled vaccine trials in Hong Kong (HK) among paediatrics during September 2009-December 2010 and the United States (US) among adults during Oct 2007 - April 2008. Intermediate unobserved titers were imputed using three interpolation methods. As participants were recruited at different times leading to varying exposure to infection relative to entry, amodified proportional hazards model was developed to account for staggered entry into the studies and to quantify the correlation of titers with protection against influenza infections, adjusting for waning in titers. The model was fitted using Markov chain Monte Carlo and importance sampling.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] A titer of 1:40 was associated with a reduced infection risk of40%-70% relative to a titer of 1:10, depending on the circulating strain; the corresponding protection associated witha titer of 1:80 was 54%-84%. Results were robust across interpolation methods. The trivalent inactivated vaccine reduced cumulative incidence of influenza B and influenza A(H3N2) infections by 6 percentage points (pp) (95% credible interval (CrI): 2pp, 10pp) and 1pp (95% CrI: 0.3pp, 2pp) respectively, but not for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. The live attenuated vaccine showed little efficacy against influenza A(H3N2) infections.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Titers are correlated with protection against influenza infections. The trivalent inactivated vaccine can reduce the risk of influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B infections in the community.


PMID: 26427723 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom