• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Pulmonology . Hyperoxemia in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients-Insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pulmonology


. 2022 Sep 15;S2531-0437(22)00211-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.09.003. Online ahead of print.
Hyperoxemia in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients-Insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study


A M Tsonas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], D M van Meenen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], M Botta[SUP] 2 [/SUP], G S Shrestha[SUP] 3 [/SUP], O Roca[SUP] 4 [/SUP], F Paulus[SUP] 5 [/SUP], A S Neto[SUP] 6 [/SUP], M J Schultz[SUP] 7 [/SUP], PRoVENT–COVID Collaborative Group



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: We determined the prevalences of hyperoxemia and excessive oxygen use, and the epidemiology, ventilation characteristics and outcomes associated with hyperoxemia in invasively ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods: Post hoc analysis of a national, multicentre, observational study in 22 ICUs. Patients were classified in the first two days of invasive ventilation as 'hyperoxemic' or 'normoxemic'. The co-primary endpoints were prevalence of hyperoxemia (PaO[SUB]2[/SUB] > 90 mmHg) and prevalence of excessive oxygen use (FiO[SUB]2[/SUB] ≥ 60% while PaO[SUB]2[/SUB] > 90 mmHg or SpO[SUB]2[/SUB] > 92%). Secondary endpoints included ventilator settings and ventilation parameters, duration of ventilation, length of stay (LOS) in ICU and hospital, and mortality in ICU, hospital, and at day 28 and 90. We used propensity matching to control for observed confounding factors that may influence endpoints.
Results: Of 851 COVID-19 patients, 225 (26.4%) were classified as hyperoxemic. Excessive oxygen use occurred in 385 (45.2%) patients. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) severity was lowest in hyperoxemic patients. Hyperoxemic patients were ventilated with higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), while rescue therapies for hypoxemia were applied more often in normoxemic patients. Neither in the unmatched nor in the matched analysis were there differences between hyperoxemic and normoxemic patients with regard to any of the clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: In this cohort of invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients, hyperoxemia occurred often and so did excessive oxygen use. The main differences between hyperoxemic and normoxemic patients were ARDS severity and use of PEEP. Clinical outcomes were not different between hyperoxemic and normoxemic patients.

Keywords: ARDS; COVID–19; Coronavirus disease 2019; Hyperoxemia; Invasive ventilation; Mortality; Normoxemia; Oxygen management; Ventilation.
 
Back
Top Bottom