• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Public Workers Group warns EPA ready to radically increase radioactive release guidelines

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20110316/NEWS08/110316027/Group-warns-EPA-ready-increase-radioactive-release-guidelines
Group warns EPA ready to increase radioactive release guidelines
10:41 AM, Mar. 16, 2011
Anne Paine
THE TENNESSEAN

http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1325
For Immediate Release: April 5, 2010
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility

RADIATION EXPOSURE DEBATE RAGES INSIDE EPA ? Plan to Radically Hike Post-Accident Radiation in Food & Water Sparks Hot Dissent

Washington, DC ? A plan awaiting approval by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that would dramatically increase permissible radioactive releases in drinking water, food and soil after ?radiological incidents? is drawing vigorous objections from agency experts, according to agency documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). At issue is the acceptable level of public health risk following a radiation release, whether an accidental spill or a ?dirty bomb? attack.
...
?This critical debate is taking place entirely behind closed doors because this plan is ?guidance? and does not require public notice as a regulation would,? stated PEER Counsel Christine Erickson. Today, PEER sent EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson a letter calling for a more open and broader examination of the proposed radiation guidance. ?We all deserve to know why some in the agency want to legitimize exposing the public to radiation at levels vastly higher than what EPA officially considers dangerous.? ....
 
Back
Top