• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Public health officials debate how to respond to loss of trust after pandemic - new US health czar possible in 2025

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: https://www.startribune.com/public-health-debate-after-covid/601172331

Public health officials debate how to respond to loss of trust after pandemic
Minneapolis hosted national conference at an inflection point for public health and its ability to navigate the U.S. through epidemics, diseases.
By Jeremy Olson
The Minnesota Star Tribune
October 31, 2024 at 6:00AM​


America’s public health leaders gathered in Minneapolis this week to grapple with the frustrating reality that too many people stopped listening to them during the COVID-19 pandemic, and still aren’t heeding their advice today.


The question looming over the conference of the American Public Health Association: how to win trust back, especially when views on public health are rooted in cultural or political beliefs.


Public health has traditionally involved one-way communication and scientists telling communities how to protect themselves from chronic diseases such as obesity, infections such as influenza, and environmental threats such as lead in old paint. That approach isn’t working, said Dr. Simbo Ige, commissioner of the Chicago Department of Public Health. Public health workers must listen, she said, even to people guided by misinformation.


“If you don’t understand how people arrive at some of these ideas, it is very hard to correct,” she said. “Our first instinct is [to say], ‘No, you are wrong.’ You cannot motivate people with shame and guilt. You have to try and spend some time to understand where [they] are coming from.”


Trust has fractured somewhat along political lines, as Republicans were more likely during the pandemic to oppose government mask-wearing requirements and vaccine mandates that were put in place in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19. A study last fall showed lingering resentment over the pandemic response made Republicans even less trusting of cancer-prevention messages.


Mistrust extends beyond politics, though. Minnesota once had one of the nation’s highest rates of children vaccinated for measles by the time they entered kindergarten, at 94%. That rate dropped to 87% at the start of the 2022-2023 school year, sixth-worst among states...




 
The lack of trust spans all government agencies. And for good reason. Even the economic data reported by the US is seen as suspect by established economic media. The inflation and labor reports are at the top of the list. So why would anyone believe anything from the HHS now? One agency's corruption infects all of them by association. A cancer.
 
Looks like a change will be coming to the health agencies. This is not a political post since the election is over. Here is the mentioned new health czar speaking yesterday about what he is going to do:




I guess we wait and see.
 
Back
Top