tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Psychiatry Investig
. 2021 Oct 8.
doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0220. Online ahead of print.
A Comparative Study of Social Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Republic of Korea, Japan, and Taiwan
Angela Lo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bang-Ook Jun[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Vincent Shieh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Clay M Starlin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Satoshi Sugahara[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Dian-Jeng Li[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objective: The frequency of various disasters has become a 21st century global crisis. The biological-disaster of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) gave rise to a multi-dimensional global impact. The 25 items of Societal Influences Survey Questionnaire (SISQ) was developed to assess various categories of social influence during the pandemic. This study compares the SISQ scores of Taiwan, Republic of Korea (Korea) and Japan.
Methods: Persons living in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan were recruited and evaluated through an SISQ online survey. The SISQ is composed of 25 items each with a 4-point Likert scale. The SISQ assesses the following six factors: self-restraint, social impact, government policy, social cost, concern of infection, and awareness of information. A principal factor analysis and reliability (Cronbach's alpha) were performed to validate the SISQ. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc analysis was conducted to explore the differences between groups.
Results: The SISQ had acceptable reliabilities, and accounted for 58.86% of the variance. The significance for ANOVA with post-hoc analysis showed that scores of self-restraints ranked highest in Japan followed by Taiwan and Korea. Taiwanese scored lower than other nations regarding the concern of infection. Koreans scored higher in awareness of information than the other two nations. The effect of age and marital status were also estimated.
Conclusion: The SISQ comprehensively evaluate multiple domains of social influence, and it manifests the divergence of social impacts across the three nations.
Keywords: Biological disaster; COVID-19; National comparisons; Social impact; Survey research.
. 2021 Oct 8.
doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0220. Online ahead of print.
A Comparative Study of Social Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Republic of Korea, Japan, and Taiwan
Angela Lo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bang-Ook Jun[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Vincent Shieh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Clay M Starlin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Satoshi Sugahara[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Dian-Jeng Li[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34619815
- DOI: 10.30773/pi.2021.0220
Abstract
Objective: The frequency of various disasters has become a 21st century global crisis. The biological-disaster of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) gave rise to a multi-dimensional global impact. The 25 items of Societal Influences Survey Questionnaire (SISQ) was developed to assess various categories of social influence during the pandemic. This study compares the SISQ scores of Taiwan, Republic of Korea (Korea) and Japan.
Methods: Persons living in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan were recruited and evaluated through an SISQ online survey. The SISQ is composed of 25 items each with a 4-point Likert scale. The SISQ assesses the following six factors: self-restraint, social impact, government policy, social cost, concern of infection, and awareness of information. A principal factor analysis and reliability (Cronbach's alpha) were performed to validate the SISQ. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc analysis was conducted to explore the differences between groups.
Results: The SISQ had acceptable reliabilities, and accounted for 58.86% of the variance. The significance for ANOVA with post-hoc analysis showed that scores of self-restraints ranked highest in Japan followed by Taiwan and Korea. Taiwanese scored lower than other nations regarding the concern of infection. Koreans scored higher in awareness of information than the other two nations. The effect of age and marital status were also estimated.
Conclusion: The SISQ comprehensively evaluate multiple domains of social influence, and it manifests the divergence of social impacts across the three nations.
Keywords: Biological disaster; COVID-19; National comparisons; Social impact; Survey research.