• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Protective effect of a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine in pigs

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2018 Jan;195:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
[h=1]Protective effect of a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine in pigs.[/h] Karlsson I[SUP]1[/SUP], Borggren M[SUP]1[/SUP], Rosenstierne MW[SUP]1[/SUP], Trebbien R[SUP]2[/SUP], Williams JA[SUP]3[/SUP], Vidal E[SUP]4[/SUP], Vergara-Alert J[SUP]4[/SUP], Foz DS[SUP]4[/SUP], Darji A[SUP]4[/SUP], Sister?-Or? M[SUP]4[/SUP], Segal?s J[SUP]5[/SUP], Nielsen J[SUP]1[/SUP], Fomsgaard A[SUP]6[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Influenza A virus in swine herds represents a major problem for the swine industry and poses a constant threat for the emergence of novel pandemic viruses and the development of more effective influenza vaccines for pigs is desired. By optimizing the vector backbone and using a needle-free delivery method, we have recently demonstrated a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine that induces a broad immune response, including both humoral and cellular immunity.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To investigate the protection of our polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine approach in a pig challenge study.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] By intradermal needle-free delivery to the skin, we immunized pigs with two different doses (500μg and 800μg) of an influenza DNA vaccine based on six genes of pandemic origin, including internally expressed matrix and nucleoprotein and externally expressed hemagglutinin and neuraminidase as previously demonstrated. Two weeks following immunization, the pigs were challenged with the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] When challenged with 2009 pandemic H1N1, 0/5 vaccinated pigs (800μg DNA) became infected whereas 5/5 unvaccinated control pigs were infected. The pigs vaccinated with the low dose (500μg DNA) were only partially protected. The DNA vaccine elicited binding-, hemagglutination inhibitory (HI) - as well as cross-reactive neutralizing antibody activity and neuraminidase inhibiting antibodies in the immunized pigs, in a dose-dependent manner.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The present data, together with the previously demonstrated immunogenicity of our influenza DNA vaccine, indicate that naked DNA vaccine technology provides a strong approach for the development of improved pig vaccines, applying realistic low doses of DNA and a convenient delivery method for mass vaccination.
Copyright ? 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Challenge; DNA vaccine; H1N1pdm09; Needle-free immunization; Protection; Swine influenza

PMID: 29249314 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.11.007
 
Back
Top Bottom