• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Promising Preclinical Results With Live Attenuated Avian Flu Vaccines

AlaskaDenise

In Memoriam
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060915204325.htm

Several approaches are in progress to develop vaccines against the avian flu variety of the [COLOR=green! important][COLOR=green! important]influenza[/COLOR][/COLOR] virus. Kanta Subbarao (National Institutes of Health) and colleagues are working on live attenuated vaccines, which have the potential to elicit a strong, broad, and lasting [COLOR=green! important][COLOR=green! important]immune [COLOR=green! important]response[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]. As they now report in the international open-access medical journal PLoS Medicine, results from mice and ferrets (the rodent flu model of choice) are very encouraging and pave the way to testing these vaccines in human volunteers.

The researchers developed vaccines using 3 artificially constructed, weakened forms of the influenza virus. The 3 vaccine viruses were constructed using [COLOR=green! important][COLOR=green! important]flu[/COLOR][/COLOR] virus proteins other than H and N from artificially weakened (attenuated) strains of influenza. These were combined with H and N proteins from H5N1 viruses isolated from human cases during three different years: 2004, 2003, and 1997. They grew larger quantities of the resulting viruses in hen eggs, and tested the vaccines in chickens, ferrets, and mice.

In tests of safety, the study found that, unlike the natural viruses from which they were derived, the vaccine strains did not cause death when injected into the bloodstream of chickens, and did not even cause persistent infection when given through the birds' breathing passages.

Similarly, while the natural viruses were lethal in mice at various doses, the vaccine strains did not cause death even at the highest dose. In ferrets, infection with the vaccine strains was limited to the upper respiratory tract, while the natural viruses spread eadily to the lungs.

In tests of protection, all mice that had received any of the 3 vaccines survived following injection with any of the natural viruses (so-called viral challenge), while unvaccinated mice died following viral challenge. This occurred even though standard blood tests could not detect a strong immune responses following a single dose of vaccine. Challenge virus was detected in the lungs of the immunized mice, but at lower levels than in the unvaccinated mice. Mice given two doses of a vaccine showed stronger immunity on blood tests, as well as almost complete protection from respiratory infection following challenge. In addition, mice and ferrets that had received two doses of vaccine were protected against challenge with H5N1 strains from more recent outbreaks in Asia that differed substantially from the strains that were used for the vaccine.

This study shows that live attenuated vaccine based on a single H5N1 virus strain can provide protection (in mice and ferrets, at least) against different H5N1 viruses that emerge years later. One of the vaccines is now being tested in human volunteers who participate in carefully conducted clinical trials.

Citation: Suguitan AL Jr., McAuliffe J, Mills KL, Jin H, Duke G, et al. (2006) Live, attenuated influenza A H5N1 candidate vaccines provide broad cross-protection in mice and ferrets. PLoS Med 3(9): e360. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030360
 
Re: Promising Preclinical Results With Live Attenuated Avian Flu Vaccines

sounds good,but no human tests yet. How long does it take to
produce a preventive vaccine and stockpile it ?
What does a dose cost approximately ?
Are two strain-vaccines much more expensive than single strain vaccines ?
Probably too expensive for Indonesia or China or India.
 
Re: Promising Preclinical Results With Live Attenuated Avian Flu Vaccines

Mucosal delivery of inactivated influenza vaccine (H3N2) induces B-cell-dependent heterosubtypic cross-protection against lethal influenza A H5N1 virus infection.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...ve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11333895&dopt=Abstract

Mice that received three intranasal (i.n.) immunizations of H3N2 vaccine in the presence of LT(R192G) were completely protected against lethal challenge with a highly pathogenic human H5N1 virus and had nasal and lung viral titers that were at least 2,500-fold lower than those of control mice receiving LT(R192G) alone. In contrast, mice that received three vaccinations of H3N2 vaccine subcutaneously in the presence or absence of LT(R192G) or incomplete Freund's adjuvant were not protected against lethal challenge and had no significant reductions in tissue virus titers


Mucosal but not parenteral vaccination induced subtype cross-reactive lung immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and serum IgG anti-hemagglutinin antibodies, suggesting the presence of a common cross-reactive epitope in the hemagglutinins of H3 and H5. These results suggest a strategy of mucosal vaccination that stimulates cross-protection against multiple influenza virus subtypes, including viruses with pandemic potential.
 
Re: Promising Preclinical Results With Live Attenuated Avian Flu Vaccines

hmm, does that mean we might be partly immune against H5N1
due to our acquired H3N2-immunity ?


it's from 2001
 
Back
Top