• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . Network medicine framework for identifying drug-repurposing opportunities for COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A


. 2021 May 11;118(19):e2025581118.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025581118.
Network medicine framework for identifying drug-repurposing opportunities for COVID-19


Deisy Morselli Gysi[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], ?talo do Valle[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Marinka Zitnik[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Asher Ameli[SUP] 2 6 [/SUP], Xiao Gan[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Onur Varol[SUP] 1 2 7 [/SUP], Susan Dina Ghiassian[SUP] 6 [/SUP], J J Patten[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Robert A Davey[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Joseph Loscalzo[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Albert-L?szl? Barab?si[SUP] 10 2 11 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to quickly and reliably prioritize clinically approved compounds for their potential effectiveness for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. Here, we deployed algorithms relying on artificial intelligence, network diffusion, and network proximity, tasking each of them to rank 6,340 drugs for their expected efficacy against SARS-CoV-2. To test the predictions, we used as ground truth 918 drugs experimentally screened in VeroE6 cells, as well as the list of drugs in clinical trials that capture the medical community's assessment of drugs with potential COVID-19 efficacy. We find that no single predictive algorithm offers consistently reliable outcomes across all datasets and metrics. This outcome prompted us to develop a multimodal technology that fuses the predictions of all algorithms, finding that a consensus among the different predictive methods consistently exceeds the performance of the best individual pipelines. We screened in human cells the top-ranked drugs, obtaining a 62% success rate, in contrast to the 0.8% hit rate of nonguided screenings. Of the six drugs that reduced viral infection, four could be directly repurposed to treat COVID-19, proposing novel treatments for COVID-19. We also found that 76 of the 77 drugs that successfully reduced viral infection do not bind the proteins targeted by SARS-CoV-2, indicating that these network drugs rely on network-based mechanisms that cannot be identified using docking-based strategies. These advances offer a methodological pathway to identify repurposable drugs for future pathogens and neglected diseases underserved by the costs and extended timeline of de novo drug development.

Keywords: drug repurposing; infectious diseases; network medicine; systems biology.
 
Back
Top Bottom