• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Preventive Veterinary Medicine: Different herd level factors associated with H1N1 or H1N2 influenza virus infections in fattening pigs

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Available online 19 August 2013

In Press, Corrected Proof ? Note to users
Cover image
Different herd level factors associated with H1N1 or H1N2 influenza virus infections in fattening pigs

C. Fableta, c, Corresponding author contact information, E-mail the corresponding author,
G. Simonb, c,
V. Dorenlora, c,
F. Eonoa, c,
E. Evenoa, c,
S. Gorinb, c,
S. Qu?guinerb, c,
F. Madeca, c,
N. Rosea, c

a Anses, Unit? Epid?miologie et Bien-Etre du Porc, B.P. 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France
b Anses, Unit? Virologie Immunologie Porcines, B.P. 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France
c Universit? Europ?enne de Bretagne, France

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.07.006
Abstract

Herd-level factors associated with European H1N1 or H1N2 swine influenza virus (SIV) infections were assessed by mean of a cross-sectional study carried out in 125 herds in France. Serum samples from 15 fattening pigs in each herd were tested by haemagglutination inhibition. Data related to herd characteristics, biosecurity, management and housing conditions were collected by questionnaire during the farm visit. Climatic conditions in the post-weaning and fattening rooms, where the sampled pigs were housed, were measured over 20 h. Factors associated with H1N1 or H1N2 sero-positive status of the herd were identified by logistic regressions for binary outcome. For both subtypes, the odds for a herd to be SIV sero-positive increased if there were more than two pig herds in the vicinity (OR = 3.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.4?7.6, p < 0.01 and OR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.5?8.1 p < 0.01 for H1N1 and H1N2 respectively). Different factors were specifically associated with either H1N1 or H1N2 SIV infections. The odds for a herd to be H1N1 sero-positive were significantly increased by having a large number of pigs per pen in the post-weaning room (OR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.2?8.6, p = 0.02), temperature setpoints below 25 ?C (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1?6.4, p = 0.03) and below 24 ?C (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1?6.1, p = 0.03) for the heating device in the farrowing room and the ventilation controller, respectively, and moving the pigs to the fattening facility via a room housing older pigs (OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.1?9.6, p = 0.03). A H1N2 sero-positive status was associated with a brief down period in the farrowing room (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1?6.3, p = 0.03), small floor area per pig in the post-weaning pen (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2?7.0, p = 0.02), large-sized fattening room (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1?5.9, p = 0.03), lack of all-in all-out management in the fattening room (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.0?5.8, p = 0.04) and a temperature range of less than 5 ?C controlling ventilation in the fattening facilities (OR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.4?7.4, p < 0.01). Factors related to external and internal biosecurity and to the control of inside climatic conditions should be considered together when implementing programmes to better control SIV infections.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587713002328
 
Back
Top Bottom