• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Prev Vet Med . Leakage-safe weekly risk mapping of highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks in domestic poultry in Japan using open outbreak, meteo

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Prev Vet Med

. 2026 Sep 24:257:107024.
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2026.107024. Online ahead of print.

Leakage-safe weekly risk mapping of highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks in domestic poultry in Japan using open outbreak, meteorological, and geospatial data​


Toshiya Arakawa 1

Affiliations

Free article

Abstract​


Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks in domestic poultry require timely surveillance, but national-scale prediction is challenging because events are rare, spatially heterogeneous, and influenced by seasonal and environmental conditions. We developed a leakage-safe weekly risk-mapping framework for poultry HPAI outbreaks in Japan using open outbreak records, ERA5-Land reanalysis, and grid-level geographic and land-use data. The unit of analysis was a 10-km grid-week. For each target week, all 5491 national grid cells were ranked using only static, calendar, and preceding-week information, retrospectively emulating weekly spatial prioritization. Performance was evaluated using event-grid risk percentiles and top-k capture rates. The final panel comprised 1641,809 grid-week observations from 31 August 2020-18 May 2026. In the rolling fiscal-year evaluation, mean event-grid risk percentiles ranged from 0.695 to 0.713 across four predictor sets. In the event-week evaluation of 49 strict first-occurrence-like events, the baseline Extra Trees model using geography, seasonality, and previous-week temperature captured 22.4% and 42.9% of events within the top 10% and 20% of national grid cells, respectively. The external GIS and land-use Extra Trees model increased the corresponding capture rates to 38.8% and 59.2%; the top-10% difference was 16.3 %age points (paired bootstrap 95% CI, 2.0-30.6), although the exact test of discordant transitions was not significant (p = 0.0768). Performance therefore remained moderate despite improvement with GIS information. The framework should be interpreted as preliminary regional decision support rather than as a stand-alone outbreak warning system.

Keywords: Geographic information systems; Highly pathogenic avian influenza; Rare events; Spatial risk ranking; Surveillance prioritization.
 
Back
Top Bottom