Practical advice for Federal, State , and Local Officials.
Doe it bother anyone else that on many of the BF web sites, there is a lot of handwringing about the inneffectiveness of the Governments plans and responses to the possible pandemic, but not a lot of positive advice?
Does it bother anyone that it's fashionable to bash the latest innane press release about not panicing, rather than shoot off a reply of how the press release could have been better worded to meet the prepardness goals?
When any of my staff comes to me with a problem, when any of my coworkers ever told me no, it couldn't be done, I go, and did go, nuts.
My mantra? Don't tell me no. Don't tell me it can't be done. Tell me what the problem is, and what are the options, however outlandish or expensive. Then we will decide together how to fix the problem.
As someone who believes that at some point action becomes more important than planning; that doing something, even if it is not the best possible choice, is often better than doing nothing; that complaining about what others are not doing or are doing incorrectly without the complainer trying to fix the problem themselves; or that sitting around waiting for others to solve problems is counterproductive, I propose that the great minds located here in FT begin to create positive, actionable advice at the Federal, State and local levels that officials can implement.
The premise here is that we can assume the Feds and State officials have created committees to study the problem, that said committees have created plans that are inclusive and "legal" and "politically correct" and "non inflamatory.
The premise is that these plans lack major tactical solutions for problems that they haven't begun to think about yet.
Let's help them. Surely some lowly staff member has been tasked to read these blogs.
Anyone want to join in?
Doe it bother anyone else that on many of the BF web sites, there is a lot of handwringing about the inneffectiveness of the Governments plans and responses to the possible pandemic, but not a lot of positive advice?
Does it bother anyone that it's fashionable to bash the latest innane press release about not panicing, rather than shoot off a reply of how the press release could have been better worded to meet the prepardness goals?
When any of my staff comes to me with a problem, when any of my coworkers ever told me no, it couldn't be done, I go, and did go, nuts.
My mantra? Don't tell me no. Don't tell me it can't be done. Tell me what the problem is, and what are the options, however outlandish or expensive. Then we will decide together how to fix the problem.
As someone who believes that at some point action becomes more important than planning; that doing something, even if it is not the best possible choice, is often better than doing nothing; that complaining about what others are not doing or are doing incorrectly without the complainer trying to fix the problem themselves; or that sitting around waiting for others to solve problems is counterproductive, I propose that the great minds located here in FT begin to create positive, actionable advice at the Federal, State and local levels that officials can implement.
The premise here is that we can assume the Feds and State officials have created committees to study the problem, that said committees have created plans that are inclusive and "legal" and "politically correct" and "non inflamatory.
The premise is that these plans lack major tactical solutions for problems that they haven't begun to think about yet.
Let's help them. Surely some lowly staff member has been tasked to read these blogs.
Anyone want to join in?
Last edited by a moderator: