tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Pract Lab Med
. 2024 Jun 7:40:e00416.
doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00416. eCollection 2024 May. Performance evaluation of influenza a rapid antigen test and PCR among nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples
Xiaosong Su[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiaye Zhou[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ling Liu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hongzhi Gao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yan Lin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhile Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xin Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Baishen Pan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Beili Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Chunyan Zhang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Wei Guo[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Objectives: Rapid antigen test (RAT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using nasopharyngeal (NP) or oropharyngeal (OP) swab specimens are the two main testing techniques used for laboratory diagnosis of influenza in clinical practice. However, performance variations have been observed not only between techniques, but also between different specimens. This study evaluated the differences in performance between specimens and testing techniques to identify the best combination in clinical practice.
Methods: Both NP and OP samples from suspected influenza patients collected in the 2023/4-2023/5 Flu-season in Xiamen, China, were tested for RAT and quantitative PCR. The testing performance of the different specimens and testing techniques were recorded and evaluated.
Results: Compared to PCR, RAT showed 58.9 % and 10.3 % sensitivity for NP and OP swabs, respectively. The Limit of Detection (LoD) was 28.71 the Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID[SUB]50[/SUB])/mL. Compared with PCR using NP swabs, PCR with OP swabs showed 89.5 % sensitivity and 95.4 % specificity.
Conclusions: There were no significant differences in performance between the specimens when PCR was used to test for influenza. However, a decrease in sensitivity was observed when the RAT was used, regardless of the specimen type. Therefore, to avoid false-negative results, PCR may be a better choice when OP swabs are used as specimens. In contrast, NP swabs should be the recommended specimens for RAT.
Keywords: Influenza; Nasopharyngeal; Oropharyngeal; Performance evaluation; Sample types.
. 2024 Jun 7:40:e00416.
doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00416. eCollection 2024 May. Performance evaluation of influenza a rapid antigen test and PCR among nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples
Xiaosong Su[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiaye Zhou[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ling Liu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hongzhi Gao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yan Lin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhile Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xin Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Baishen Pan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Beili Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Chunyan Zhang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Wei Guo[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38989481
- PMCID: PMC11234145
- DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00416
Objectives: Rapid antigen test (RAT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using nasopharyngeal (NP) or oropharyngeal (OP) swab specimens are the two main testing techniques used for laboratory diagnosis of influenza in clinical practice. However, performance variations have been observed not only between techniques, but also between different specimens. This study evaluated the differences in performance between specimens and testing techniques to identify the best combination in clinical practice.
Methods: Both NP and OP samples from suspected influenza patients collected in the 2023/4-2023/5 Flu-season in Xiamen, China, were tested for RAT and quantitative PCR. The testing performance of the different specimens and testing techniques were recorded and evaluated.
Results: Compared to PCR, RAT showed 58.9 % and 10.3 % sensitivity for NP and OP swabs, respectively. The Limit of Detection (LoD) was 28.71 the Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID[SUB]50[/SUB])/mL. Compared with PCR using NP swabs, PCR with OP swabs showed 89.5 % sensitivity and 95.4 % specificity.
Conclusions: There were no significant differences in performance between the specimens when PCR was used to test for influenza. However, a decrease in sensitivity was observed when the RAT was used, regardless of the specimen type. Therefore, to avoid false-negative results, PCR may be a better choice when OP swabs are used as specimens. In contrast, NP swabs should be the recommended specimens for RAT.
Keywords: Influenza; Nasopharyngeal; Oropharyngeal; Performance evaluation; Sample types.