• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Policy Considerations for Improving Influenza Vaccination Rates among Pregnant Women

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Public Health Nurs. 2014 Jan 6. doi: 10.1111/phn.12099. [Epub ahead of print]
Policy Considerations for Improving Influenza Vaccination Rates among Pregnant Women.
Mollard EK, Guenzel N, Brown PA, Keeler HJ, Cramer ME.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Influenza exposure during pregnancy can cause severe health problems for both the mother and her offspring, including an increased risk of mortality. Influenza vaccination during all trimesters of pregnancy is safe and effective, and recommended by professional organizations such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Despite these recommendations, the U.S. vaccination rates remain low in this high-risk population.
METHOD:

A policy analysis based on the five-part method identified by Teitelbaum and Wilensky () addresses factors to consider in identifying the best voluntary policy options to improve the vaccination rates. The authors provide discussion of the background, landscape, and stakeholder interests and the pros and cons of two voluntary policy options to increase vaccination. The policy options include: (a) financial incentives for providers and (b) an education emphasis for providers and staff.
CONCLUSIONS:

The authors conclude that based on considerations of cost, provider preference, and practicality of implementation, a continuing educational intervention is the preferred policy venue to increase vaccination rates.

? 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
KEYWORDS:

education, immunization, influenza, policy, pregnancy, vaccination

PMID:
24386885
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24386885
 
Back
Top Bottom