• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Point-of-care influenza testing does not significantly shorten time to disposition among patients with an influenza-like illness

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7. pii: S0735-6757(18)30640-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.005. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Point-of-care influenza testing does not significantly shorten time to disposition among patients with an influenza-like illness.[/h] Schechter-Perkins EM[SUP]1[/SUP], Mitchell PM[SUP]2[/SUP], Nelson KP[SUP]3[/SUP], Liu JH[SUP]2[/SUP], Shannon A[SUP]4[/SUP], Ahern J[SUP]4[/SUP], Orr B[SUP]4[/SUP], Miller NS[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]INTRODUCTION:[/h] Availability of anti-viral agents and need to isolate infected patients increases the need to confirm the diagnosis of influenza before determining patient disposition.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] We sought to determine if time-to-disposition (TTD) was shorter among patients tested for influenza using an Emergency Department (ED) Point-of-care (POC) test compared to core laboratory (lab) test and to determine difference in antibiotic use between groups.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] We prospectively enrolled a convenience sample of ED patients for whom influenza testing was ordered during influenza season 2017. Participants were randomized to POC or lab. Data collected included demographics, chief complaint, influenza test results, turnaround time (TAT), whether antibiotics were given, and TTD. Descriptive statistics were calculated and group comparisons conducted using chi squared and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Study population included 100 in the POC group and 97 in the lab group. Demographics were similar between POC and lab participants. More flu positive results were reported in the POC group compared to the lab group (51.0% vs. 33.0% p = 0.01). The median TTD was 146.5 min (IQR 98.5) for POC group and 165.5 min (IQR 127) for lab group (p = 0.26). The median TAT was 30.5 min (IQR 7.5) for POC group and 106.0 min (IQR 55) for core lab group (p = 0.001). Antibiotics were given to 14.0% of POC participants and 14.4% of lab participants (p = 0.93).
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Although use of a POC influenza test provided more rapid TAT than use of a core lab test, there was no significant difference in TTD or antibiotic use between groups.
Copyright ? 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Diagnostics; Infectious disease; Influenza assay; POC testing; Respiratory virus

PMID: 30107967 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.005
 
Back
Top Bottom