• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PNAS Nexus . Proactive vs. reactive COVID-19 screening in schools: Lessons from experimental protocols in France during the Delta and Omicron waves

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PNAS Nexus


. 2026 Mar 9;5(3):pgag061.
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag061. eCollection 2026 Mar.
Proactive vs. reactive COVID-19 screening in schools: Lessons from experimental protocols in France during the Delta and Omicron waves

Elisabetta Colosi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bruno Lina[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Christelle Elias[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Philippe Vanhems[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Vittoria Colizza[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted diverse policies to manage safety in schools, balancing transmission control with educational continuity. We evaluated an experimental weekly screening protocol through salivary PCR tests against nationally implemented reactive strategies (class closure or class screening following case detection) in 25 primary schools in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region of France during the Delta (November-December 2021) and Omicron (January-February 2022) waves. We used an agent-based model of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission in schools, parameterized with empirical contact data and fitted to observed prevalence in 18 schools selected for the analysis under variant-specific epidemiological conditions. We simulated the weekly screening following the experimental protocol, with 7-day isolation of positive cases and class closure after three detected cases. We quantified reductions in within-school transmission and student-days lost and combined efficacy. The experimental weekly screening protocol reduced within-school transmission by 40% (interquartile range [IQR] 18-53%) during the Delta wave and 39% (IQR 31-46%) during the Omicron wave, relative to reactive strategies implemented nationally. Across both waves, weekly screening without class closure achieved the greatest overall efficiency, balancing transmission reduction and educational continuity. By mitigating asymptomatic spread through a structured and predictable testing schedule, weekly screening offered operational advantages over reactive strategies. These findings explicitly quantify key trade-offs between infection control and educational continuity and inform the design of proactive school-based interventions in future pandemics.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; agent-based model; school transmission; screening.

 
Back
Top