• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . The added diagnostic value of RT-PCR on faeces for the diagnosis of COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0322543.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322543. eCollection 2025. The added diagnostic value of RT-PCR on faeces for the diagnosis of COVID-19

Nathalie Van der Moeren[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Rik van den Biggelaar[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Karin B Gast[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jaco J Verweij[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Barbara J M Bergmans[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Joep J J M Stohr[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Jean-Luc Murk[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether combining a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on a fecal sample [FS] with a RT-PCR on an upper respiratory tract sample [URTS] results in additional COVID-19 diagnoses.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study at a regional hospital in The Netherlands from 27 February 2020-30 June 2020. Patients presenting with COVID-19-like symptoms for who a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on both URTS and FS were obtained within 24 hours were included. We calculated the difference in positive RT-PCR when combining URTS/FS compared to URTS alone, overall and stratified by symptom duration and disease severity.
Results: Three hundred eighty-six patients were included of which 63 had a positive RT-PCR on URTS [n = 8], FS [n = 19] or both [n = 36], corresponding to a prevalence of 16.3%. The addition of testing FS increased the number of COVID-19 diagnoses by 31.8% [95%CI 20,3%-43,2%].
Conclusions: We showed that adding SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on FS to URTS yields significantly more COVID-19 diagnoses. The inclusion of an FS may therefore be considered in patients with a negative URTS and high suspicion of COVID-19.


 
Back
Top Bottom