• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Social vulnerability and spatial patterns of COVID-19 mortality: Global implications for respiratory health equity

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2026 Jul 1;21(7):e0352270.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352270. eCollection 2026.
Social vulnerability and spatial patterns of COVID-19 mortality: Global implications for respiratory health equity

Gregory D Kearney[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ogugua Ndili Obi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Veeranna Maddipati[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Gregory Levitin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Guangxiao Hu[SUP] 4 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The pandemic highlighted geographic inequities in COVID-19 mortality worldwide, reflecting structural and social vulnerabilities that exacerbated respiratory disease outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to examine the spatial relationship between COVID-19 mortality and communities characterized by greater social disadvantage in North Carolina. This application highlights the value of spatial analytic approaches when considering inequities in respiratory mortality.
Methods: This study analyzed 25,051 COVID-19 deaths occurring in North Carolina from March 2020 through April 2022 using state vital statistics data and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Social Vulnerability Index data. SaTScan™ was used to identify mortality hot spots, and Moran's I in ArcGIS Pro was used to assess spatial autocorrelation at the ZIP-Code Tabulation Area level. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences in social vulnerability index scores in mortality hot spots areas and non-hot spots areas.
Results: Local bivariate analysis identified moderate spatial clustering characterized by high-high (mortality-vulnerability) hot spots and spatial outliers. In non-parametric testing, COVID-19 mortality hot spot areas had significantly higher, but modestly elevated, median overall social vulnerability index scores compared with non-hot spot areas (0.58 vs. 0.45; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Social vulnerability partially explains the observed spatial heterogeneity in COVID-19 mortality (2020-2022), with statistically significant spatial clustering consistently concentrated in areas of higher social vulnerability. This study highlights how pre-existing inequities in healthcare access and social conditions intensified mortality disparities during the pandemic.


 
Back
Top