• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Residual clinical damage after COVID-19: A retrospective and prospective observational cohort study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0239570.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239570. eCollection 2020.
Residual clinical damage after COVID-19: A retrospective and prospective observational cohort study


Rebecca De Lorenzo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Caterina Conte[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Chiara Lanzani[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Francesco Benedetti[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Luisa Roveri[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mario G Mazza[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Elena Brioni[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Giacomo Giacalone[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Valentina Canti[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Valentina Sofia[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marta D'Amico[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Davide Di Napoli[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Alberto Ambrosio[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Paolo Scarpellini[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Antonella Castagna[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Giovanni Landoni[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Alberto Zangrillo[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Emanuele Bosi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Moreno Tresoldi[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Fabio Ciceri[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Patrizia Rovere-Querini[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article

Abstract

Data on residual clinical damage after Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) are lacking. The aims of this study were to investigate whether COVID-19 leaves behind residual dysfunction, and identify patients who might benefit from post-discharge monitoring. All patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) for COVID-19, and evaluated at post-discharge follow-up between 7 April and 7 May, 2020, were enrolled. Primary outcome was need of follow-up, defined as the presence at follow-up of at least one among: respiratory rate (RR) >20 breaths/min, uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) requiring therapeutic change, moderate to very severe dyspnoea, malnutrition, or new-onset cognitive impairment, according to validated scores. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) served as secondary outcome. 185 patients were included. Median [interquartile range] time from hospital discharge to follow-up was 23 [20-29] days. 109 (58.9%) patients needed follow-up. At follow-up evaluation, 58 (31.3%) patients were dyspnoeic, 41 (22.2%) tachypnoeic, 10 (5.4%) malnourished, 106 (57.3%) at risk for malnutrition. Forty (21.6%) patients had uncontrolled BP requiring therapeutic change, and 47 (25.4%) new-onset cognitive impairment. PTSD was observed in 41 (22.2%) patients. At regression tree analysis, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) and body mass index (BMI) at ED presentation, and age emerged as independent predictors of the need of follow-up. Patients with PaO2/FiO2 <324 and BMI ≥33 Kg/m2 had the highest odds to require follow-up. Among hospitalised patients, age ≥63 years, or age <63 plus non-invasive ventilation or diabetes identified those with the highest probability to need follow-up. PTSD was independently predicted by female gender and hospitalisation, the latter being protective (odds ratio, OR, 4.03, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.76 to 9.47, p 0.0011; OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.92, p 0.033, respectively). COVID-19 leaves behind physical and psychological dysfunctions. Follow-up programmes should be implemented for selected patients.
 
Back
Top Bottom