tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One
. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0238842.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238842. eCollection 2020.
Physician preparedness for resource allocation decisions under pandemic conditions: A cross-sectional survey of Canadian physicians, April 2020
Brian Dewar[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joanna E Anderson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Edmund S H Kwok[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tim Ramsay[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dar Dowlatshahi[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Robert Fahed[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Claire Dyason[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Michel Shamy[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Under the pandemic conditions created by the novel coronavirus of 2019 (COVID-19), physicians have faced difficult choices allocating scarce resources, including but not limited to critical care beds and ventilators. Past experiences with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and current reports suggest that making these decisions carries a heavy emotional toll for physicians around the world. We sought to explore Canadian physicians' preparedness and attitudes regarding resource allocation decisions.
Methods: From April 3 to April 13, 2020, we conducted an 8-question online survey of physicians practicing in the region of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, organized around 4 themes: physician preparedness for resource rationing, physician preparedness to offer palliative care, attitudes towards resource allocation policy, and approaches to resource allocation decision-making.
Results: We collected 219 responses, of which 165 were used for analysis. The majority (78%) of respondents felt "somewhat" or "a little prepared" to make resource allocation decisions, and 13% felt "not at all prepared." A majority of respondents (63%) expected the provision of palliative care to be "very" or "somewhat difficult." Most respondents (83%) either strongly or somewhat agreed that there should be policy to guide resource allocation. Physicians overwhelmingly agreed on certain factors that would be important in resource allocation, including whether patients were likely to survive, and whether they had dementia and other significant comorbidities. Respondents generally did not feel confident that they would have the social support they needed at the time of making resource allocation decisions.
Interpretation: This rapidly implemented survey suggests that a sample of Canadian physicians feel underprepared to make resource allocation decisions, and desire both more emotional support and clear, transparent, evidence-based policy.
. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0238842.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238842. eCollection 2020.
Physician preparedness for resource allocation decisions under pandemic conditions: A cross-sectional survey of Canadian physicians, April 2020
Brian Dewar[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joanna E Anderson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Edmund S H Kwok[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tim Ramsay[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dar Dowlatshahi[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Robert Fahed[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Claire Dyason[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Michel Shamy[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33091015
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238842
Abstract
Background: Under the pandemic conditions created by the novel coronavirus of 2019 (COVID-19), physicians have faced difficult choices allocating scarce resources, including but not limited to critical care beds and ventilators. Past experiences with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and current reports suggest that making these decisions carries a heavy emotional toll for physicians around the world. We sought to explore Canadian physicians' preparedness and attitudes regarding resource allocation decisions.
Methods: From April 3 to April 13, 2020, we conducted an 8-question online survey of physicians practicing in the region of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, organized around 4 themes: physician preparedness for resource rationing, physician preparedness to offer palliative care, attitudes towards resource allocation policy, and approaches to resource allocation decision-making.
Results: We collected 219 responses, of which 165 were used for analysis. The majority (78%) of respondents felt "somewhat" or "a little prepared" to make resource allocation decisions, and 13% felt "not at all prepared." A majority of respondents (63%) expected the provision of palliative care to be "very" or "somewhat difficult." Most respondents (83%) either strongly or somewhat agreed that there should be policy to guide resource allocation. Physicians overwhelmingly agreed on certain factors that would be important in resource allocation, including whether patients were likely to survive, and whether they had dementia and other significant comorbidities. Respondents generally did not feel confident that they would have the social support they needed at the time of making resource allocation decisions.
Interpretation: This rapidly implemented survey suggests that a sample of Canadian physicians feel underprepared to make resource allocation decisions, and desire both more emotional support and clear, transparent, evidence-based policy.