• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Modeling the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and the efficacy of different vaccines across different network structures

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2025 Jun 5;20(6):e0325129.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325129. eCollection 2025. Modeling the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and the efficacy of different vaccines across different network structures

Gregg Hartvigsen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yannis Dimitroff[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

We developed a network-based SEIRV model to test different vaccine efficacies on SARS-CoV-2 (Betacoronavirus pandemicum) dynamics in a naive population of 25,000 susceptible adults. Different vaccine efficacies, derived from data, were administered at different rates across a range of different Watts-Strogatz network structures. The model suggests that differences among vaccines were of minor importance compared to vaccination rates and network structure. Additionally, we tested the effect of strain differences in transmissibility (R0 values of 2.5 and 5.0) and found that this was the most important factor influencing the number of individuals ultimately infected. However, network structure was most important in affecting the maximum number of individuals that were infectious during the epidemic peak. The interaction of network structure, vaccination effort, and difference in strain transmissibility was highly significant for all epidemic metrics. The model suggests that differences in vaccine efficacy are not as important as vaccination rate in reducing epidemic sizes. Further, the importance of the evolution of viral transmission rates and our ability to develop effective vaccines to combat these strains will be of primary concern for our ability to control future disease epidemics.


 
Back
Top Bottom