• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Lockdown and psychological stress in Wuhan, China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0274696.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274696. eCollection 2023.
Lockdown and psychological stress in Wuhan, China


Mengying Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wenjing Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Boya Zhu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qi Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yubin Zhang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shuzhen Peng[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ling Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xiaodong Tan[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Wuhan was the epicenter of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), outbreak in China. We aimed at surveying the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological state and its influencing factors after the Wuhan shutdown on January 23.
Methods: The cross-sectional survey was conducted online and 4,701 respondents participated in this survey. Of them, 3,803 respondents were considered for final analysis. Data on subjective indicators of daily life changes were collected, and individual scores on changes in anxiety, depression, and stress were tested by 8-item, 11-item, and 6-item questionnaires, respectively.
Results: Multivariable regression analyses showed that living in the rural areas, living in the other regions except Hubei, and higher education were independent correlates of less negative emotions. Besides, the level of attention, self-assessed infection risk, impact on the daily life and mental health help-seeking tended to be positively associated with the scores of anxiety, depression, and stress.
Conclusions: City of residence, education, marital status, monthly income, level of attention, self-assessed infection risk, impact on daily life and mental health help-seeking were important correlates of anxiety, depression, and stress scores.
 
The people who fell to their deaths trying to get food and/or escape were not among the respondents apparently.

So death was not measured for its impact on daily life and mental health.
 
Back
Top