• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Bayesian reanalysis of early remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in outpatients with high risk of progression to severe disease

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2026 Apr 16;21(4):e0346878.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0346878. eCollection 2026.
Bayesian reanalysis of early remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in outpatients with high risk of progression to severe disease

Mazin Abdelghany[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fang Yu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stephen Rennard[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yeongjin Gwon[SUP] 2 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Though Bayesian methods are flexible, intuitive, and readily incorporated into clinical decision-making, with particular utility when prior information is available, they remain underutilized in the analysis of clinical trials.
Methods: In PINETREE, a Phase 3 randomized controlled trial (RCT) of remdesivir (RDV) for the treatment of outpatients with COVID-19 at high risk of severe disease, the primary outcome of COVID-19-related hospitalization or all-cause death was reanalyzed using a range of reference and data-driven priors. Posterior probability distributions were used to calculate the probability that the estimated hazard ratio (HR) was below a range of clinically meaningful specified thresholds and to estimate the treatment effect and its 95% credible interval (CrI).
Results: Under a minimally informative prior, the posterior probability of an estimated HR less than 1 for COVID-19-related hospitalization or all-cause death was 1 with a posterior median HR 0.13 and 95% CrI 0.02-0.47, recovering the frequentist estimates. Moreover, estimated posterior probability distributions, posterior median HRs, and 95% CrIs were robust across a range of both reference and data-driven prior choices, indicating the strength of the trial data. Lastly, using priors that incorporate historical RCT data, precision of the estimated posterior median HR and 95% CrI was improved over naïve, frequentist estimates.
Conclusions: In a Bayesian reanalysis of the PINETREE trial, there was a 98.9% or greater probability that treatment with RDV reduced the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization or all-cause death across all prior probability distributions.


 
Back
Top