tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One
. 2024 May 28;19(5):e0295618.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295618. eCollection 2024. Assessing the impact of institutional mistrust on parental endorsement for COVID-19 vaccination among school communities in San Diego County, California
Tina Le[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marlene Flores[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vinton Omaleki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ashkan Hassani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anh V Vo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], F Carrissa Wijaya[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard S Garfein[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rebecca Fielding-Miller[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: Institutional mistrust has weakened COVID-19 mitigation efforts. Assessing to what extent institutional mistrust impacts parental decision making is important in formulating structural efforts for improving future pandemic response. We hypothesized that institutional mistrust is associated with lower parental endorsement for COVID-19 vaccination.
Methods: We distributed an online survey among parents from schools in areas with high levels of social vulnerability relative to the rest of San Diego County. We defined vaccination endorsement as having a child aged 5 years or older who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose or being very likely to vaccinate their child aged 6 months-4 years when eligible. Institutional mistrust reflected the level of confidence in institutions using an aggregate score from 11 to 44. We built a multivariable logistic regression model with potential confounding variables.
Findings: Out of 290 parents in our sample, most were female (87.6%), reported their child as Hispanic/Latino (73.4%), and expressed vaccination endorsement (52.1%). For every one-point increase in mistrust score, there was an 8% reduction in the likelihood of participants endorsing vaccination for their child. Other statistically significant correlates that were positively associated with vaccination endorsement included parent vaccination status, child age, parent age, and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity.
Conclusion: Our study further demonstrates how institutional mistrust hinders public response during health emergencies. Our findings also highlight the importance of building confidence in institutions and its downstream effects on pandemic preparedness and public health. One way that institutions can improve their relationship with constituents is through building genuine partnerships with trusted community figures.
. 2024 May 28;19(5):e0295618.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295618. eCollection 2024. Assessing the impact of institutional mistrust on parental endorsement for COVID-19 vaccination among school communities in San Diego County, California
Tina Le[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marlene Flores[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vinton Omaleki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ashkan Hassani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anh V Vo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], F Carrissa Wijaya[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard S Garfein[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rebecca Fielding-Miller[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38805443
- PMCID: PMC11132501
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295618
Background: Institutional mistrust has weakened COVID-19 mitigation efforts. Assessing to what extent institutional mistrust impacts parental decision making is important in formulating structural efforts for improving future pandemic response. We hypothesized that institutional mistrust is associated with lower parental endorsement for COVID-19 vaccination.
Methods: We distributed an online survey among parents from schools in areas with high levels of social vulnerability relative to the rest of San Diego County. We defined vaccination endorsement as having a child aged 5 years or older who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose or being very likely to vaccinate their child aged 6 months-4 years when eligible. Institutional mistrust reflected the level of confidence in institutions using an aggregate score from 11 to 44. We built a multivariable logistic regression model with potential confounding variables.
Findings: Out of 290 parents in our sample, most were female (87.6%), reported their child as Hispanic/Latino (73.4%), and expressed vaccination endorsement (52.1%). For every one-point increase in mistrust score, there was an 8% reduction in the likelihood of participants endorsing vaccination for their child. Other statistically significant correlates that were positively associated with vaccination endorsement included parent vaccination status, child age, parent age, and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity.
Conclusion: Our study further demonstrates how institutional mistrust hinders public response during health emergencies. Our findings also highlight the importance of building confidence in institutions and its downstream effects on pandemic preparedness and public health. One way that institutions can improve their relationship with constituents is through building genuine partnerships with trusted community figures.