• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS Med . Rapid Epidemiological Analysis of Comorbidities and Treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): A population-based

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS Med


. 2020 Oct 20;17(10):e1003374.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003374. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Rapid Epidemiological Analysis of Comorbidities and Treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): A population-based case-control study


Paul M McKeigue[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Amanda Weir[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jen Bishop[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stuart J McGurnaghan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sharon Kennedy[SUP] 4 [/SUP], David McAllister[SUP] 2 5 [/SUP], Chris Robertson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Rachael Wood[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nazir Lone[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Janet Murray[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Thomas M Caparrotta[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alison Smith-Palmer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], David Goldberg[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jim McMenamin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Colin Ramsay[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sharon Hutchinson[SUP] 2 7 [/SUP], Helen M Colhoun[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Public Health Scotland COVID-19 Health Protection Study Group



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The objectives of this study were to identify risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to lay the basis for risk stratification based on demographic data and health records.
Methods and findings: The design was a matched case-control study. Severe COVID-19 was defined as either a positive nucleic acid test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the national database followed by entry to a critical care unit or death within 28 days or a death certificate with COVID-19 as underlying cause. Up to 10 controls per case matched for sex, age, and primary care practice were selected from the national population register. For this analysis-based on ascertainment of positive test results up to 6 June 2020, entry to critical care up to 14 June 2020, and deaths registered up to 14 June 2020-there were 36,948 controls and 4,272 cases, of which 1,894 (44%) were care home residents. All diagnostic codes from the past 5 years of hospitalisation records and all drug codes from prescriptions dispensed during the past 240 days were extracted. Rate ratios for severe COVID-19 were estimated by conditional logistic regression. In a logistic regression using the age-sex distribution of the national population, the odds ratios for severe disease were 2.87 for a 10-year increase in age and 1.63 for male sex. In the case-control analysis, the strongest risk factor was residence in a care home, with rate ratio 21.4 (95% CI 19.1-23.9, p = 8 ? 10-644). Univariate rate ratios for conditions listed by public health agencies as conferring high risk were 2.75 (95% CI 1.96-3.88, p = 6 ? 10-9) for type 1 diabetes, 1.60 (95% CI 1.48-1.74, p = 8 ? 10-30) for type 2 diabetes, 1.49 (95% CI 1.37-1.61, p = 3 ? 10-21) for ischemic heart disease, 2.23 (95% CI 2.08-2.39, p = 4 ? 10-109) for other heart disease, 1.96 (95% CI 1.83-2.10, p = 2 ? 10-78) for chronic lower respiratory tract disease, 4.06 (95% CI 3.15-5.23, p = 3 ? 10-27) for chronic kidney disease, 5.4 (95% CI 4.9-5.8, p = 1 ? 10-354) for neurological disease, 3.61 (95% CI 2.60-5.00, p = 2 ? 10-14) for chronic liver disease, and 2.66 (95% CI 1.86-3.79, p = 7 ? 10-8) for immune deficiency or suppression. Seventy-eight percent of cases and 52% of controls had at least one listed condition (51% of cases and 11% of controls under age 40). Severe disease was associated with encashment of at least one prescription in the past 9 months and with at least one hospital admission in the past 5 years (rate ratios 3.10 [95% CI 2.59-3.71] and 2.75 [95% CI 2.53-2.99], respectively) even after adjusting for the listed conditions. In those without listed conditions, significant associations with severe disease were seen across many hospital diagnoses and drug categories. Age and sex provided 2.58 bits of information for discrimination. A model based on demographic variables, listed conditions, hospital diagnoses, and prescriptions provided an additional 1.07 bits (C-statistic 0.804). A limitation of this study is that records from primary care were not available.
Conclusions: We have shown that, along with older age and male sex, severe COVID-19 is strongly associated with past medical history across all age groups. Many comorbidities beyond the risk conditions designated by public health agencies contribute to this. A risk classifier that uses all the information available in health records, rather than only a limited set of conditions, will more accurately discriminate between low-risk and high-risk individuals who may require shielding until the epidemic is over.
 
Back
Top Bottom