tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Phys Fluids (1994)
. 2021 Feb 1;33(2):021701.
doi: 10.1063/5.0037924. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Why coronavirus survives longer on impermeable than porous surfaces
Sanghamitro Chatterjee[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Janani Srree Murallidharan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amit Agrawal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rajneesh Bhardwaj[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Previous studies reported that the drying time of a respiratory droplet on an impermeable surface along with a residual film left on it is correlated with the coronavirus survival time. Notably, earlier virus titer measurements revealed that the survival time is surprisingly less on porous surfaces such as paper and cloth than that on impermeable surfaces. Previous studies could not capture this distinct aspect of the porous media. We demonstrate how the mass loss of a respiratory droplet and the evaporation mechanism of a thin liquid film are modified for the porous media, which leads to a faster decay of the coronavirus on such media. While diffusion-limited evaporation governs the mass loss from the bulk droplet for the impermeable surface, a much faster capillary imbibition process dominates the mass loss for the porous material. After the bulk droplet vanishes, a thin liquid film remaining on the exposed solid area serves as a medium for the virus survival. However, the thin film evaporates much faster on porous surfaces than on impermeable surfaces. The aforesaid faster film evaporation is attributed to droplet spreading due to the capillary action between the contact line and fibers present on the porous surface and the modified effective wetted area due to the voids of porous materials, which leads to an enhanced disjoining pressure within the film, thereby accelerating the film evaporation. Therefore, the porous materials are less susceptible to virus survival. The findings have been compared with the previous virus titer measurements.
. 2021 Feb 1;33(2):021701.
doi: 10.1063/5.0037924. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Why coronavirus survives longer on impermeable than porous surfaces
Sanghamitro Chatterjee[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Janani Srree Murallidharan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amit Agrawal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rajneesh Bhardwaj[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33746485
- PMCID: PMC7978145
- DOI: 10.1063/5.0037924
Abstract
Previous studies reported that the drying time of a respiratory droplet on an impermeable surface along with a residual film left on it is correlated with the coronavirus survival time. Notably, earlier virus titer measurements revealed that the survival time is surprisingly less on porous surfaces such as paper and cloth than that on impermeable surfaces. Previous studies could not capture this distinct aspect of the porous media. We demonstrate how the mass loss of a respiratory droplet and the evaporation mechanism of a thin liquid film are modified for the porous media, which leads to a faster decay of the coronavirus on such media. While diffusion-limited evaporation governs the mass loss from the bulk droplet for the impermeable surface, a much faster capillary imbibition process dominates the mass loss for the porous material. After the bulk droplet vanishes, a thin liquid film remaining on the exposed solid area serves as a medium for the virus survival. However, the thin film evaporates much faster on porous surfaces than on impermeable surfaces. The aforesaid faster film evaporation is attributed to droplet spreading due to the capillary action between the contact line and fibers present on the porous surface and the modified effective wetted area due to the voids of porous materials, which leads to an enhanced disjoining pressure within the film, thereby accelerating the film evaporation. Therefore, the porous materials are less susceptible to virus survival. The findings have been compared with the previous virus titer measurements.