• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccination Against COVID-19: A Systematic Review

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf


. 2025 Feb;34(2):e70099.
doi: 10.1002/pds.70099. Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccination Against COVID-19: A Systematic Review

E Claire Newbern[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lea Wildisen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rita Verstraeten[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Corinne Willame[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kevin Haynes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bennett Levitan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nicolas Praet[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Purpose: With the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines, there has been a proliferation of quantitative benefit-risk assessments (qBRAs). Prior work on other types of vaccines has found that published qBRAs have not always clearly reported methods and/or results needed to assist in the application of the qBRA findings. The aim was to systematically identify, review, and critically assess published COVID-19 vaccine qBRA. The ultimate goal is to support the future development of robust qBRA for existing, new, and updated vaccines.
Methods: We systematically reviewed COVID-19 vaccine qBRAs identified from multiple sources through April 17, 2023, including literature databases, selected Health Authority websites, and a grey literature search. We critically assessed whether key features typical of qBRA were presented in these reports.
Results: We identified 37 COVID-19 vaccine qBRAs from screening 2220 publications and 18 other sources. The qBRAs were conducted on two mRNA and two adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines. Only one qBRA represented low- and middle-income countries. Although many qBRAs used simple calculations (n = 25), more complex models were presented in 15 reports. Simple approaches were able to employ stratification by age and/or sex to highlight safety issues affecting specific demographic groups and scenarios to account for changes in viral transmission and vaccine effectiveness over time. Details regarding data sources and analytic methods were missing or limited in some reports.
Conclusions: This comprehensive description and critical assessment of COVID-19 vaccine qBRAs together with available guidance can be used to support the development of robust and transparent future vaccine qBRAs.

Keywords: COVID‐19; quantitative benefit–risk assessment; vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom