gsgs
Registered User
we need more phases than 6. I would like WHO to tell us,
whether we are closer to 3.1,3.2,...,3.8,3.9
or what they consider the likelyhood that we will be
(at least) at 4
by -say- spring or summer 2007.
But WHO is not trying to be very open and informative here.
In contrary, I get the feeling that they avoid to talk
about this. WHO doesn't say how likely they consider
a pandemic and the phases are not used to ahow this
very well. Of, course, the higher the phase, the more likely
-we would expect- they consider a pandemic.
But besides that there is little information. It could go from
3 directly to 6.
They could delay going to 4 for political
or funding reasons.
whether we are closer to 3.1,3.2,...,3.8,3.9
or what they consider the likelyhood that we will be
(at least) at 4
by -say- spring or summer 2007.
But WHO is not trying to be very open and informative here.
In contrary, I get the feeling that they avoid to talk
about this. WHO doesn't say how likely they consider
a pandemic and the phases are not used to ahow this
very well. Of, course, the higher the phase, the more likely
-we would expect- they consider a pandemic.
But besides that there is little information. It could go from
3 directly to 6.
They could delay going to 4 for political
or funding reasons.