• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Peter Sandman Comments & Questions

Re: Peter Sandman Comments & Questions

While I had read many of thier main articles I had not found that Q&A section but it is now bookmarked as the responces to questions - and the questions - are at least as good a read as some of the long pieces.

Thanks for the link Snowy.
 
Re: Peter Sandman Comments & Questions

Excellent resource! A little something for everyone. Like JJ, I have read many of the main Sandman/Lanard articles but was unaware of the Q&A. Thank you Snowy for bringing it to our attention.
 
Re: Peter Sandman Comments & Questions

Thanks for posting those additional links, Snowy.

For a COMPLETELY different view of Peter Sandman's work, check out the Australian newspaper The Age, August 16 2006 (it is "tomorrow" here already!).

An Australia Wheat trading company, the Australian Wheat Board -- now called AWB -- got itself caught in the United Nations Oil-for-Food scandal on the food side of the trade: knowingly or unknowingly, they ended up paying kickbacks to the Saddam Hussein regime in order to sell Australian wheat to Iraq. They are the largest player in the "Food" end of the Oil-for-Food debacle.

The company seems to have hired Peter Sandman to help them apologize for what they "knew or should have known" about their connection to kickbacks. They rejected and buried his advice, but it all got outed anyway -- through the legal discovery process -- in official hearings that are going on in Melbourne right now. (The Cole Commission Hearings on the findings of the Volcker report regarding the UN Oil for Food program.)

In this article from today's paper, it sounds like he completely eviscerated them for their beyond disingenuous excuses.

Not the kind of material that usually ends up in public.

"Sorry is the hardest word for AWB", The Age, August 16, 2006,
at: http://tinyurl.com/z6nf5
 
Re: Peter Sandman Comments & Questions

A very interesting read, Thank you, Snowy Owl
 
Last edited:
Back
Top