tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Perspectives on Research with H5N1 Avian Influenza: Scientific Inquiry, Communication, Controversy: Summary of a Workshop.
Editors
Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Life Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Forum on Microbial Threats; Board on Global Health; National Research Council; Institute of Medicine.
Source
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 Apr.
Excerpt
When, in late 2011, it became public knowledge that two research groups had submitted for publication manuscripts that reported on their work on mammalian transmissibility of a lethal H5N1 avian influenza strain, the information caused an international debate about the appropriateness and communication of the researchers' work, the risks associated with the work, partial or complete censorship of scientific publications, and dual-use research of concern in general. Recognizing that the H5N1 research is only the most recent scientific activity subject to widespread attention due to safety and security concerns, on May 1, 2012, the National Research Council's Committee on Science, Technology and Law, in conjunction with the Board on Life Sciences and the Institute of Medicine's Forum on Microbial Threats, convened a one-day public workshop for the purposes of 1) discussing the H5N1 controversy; 2) considering responses by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which had funded this research, the World Health Organization, the U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), scientific publishers, and members of the international research community; and 3) providing a forum wherein the concerns and interests of the broader community of stakeholders, including policy makers, biosafety and biosecurity experts, non-governmental organizations, international organizations, and the general public might be articulated. Perspectives on Research with H5N1 Avian Influenza: Scientific Enquiry, Communication, Controversy summarizes the proceedings of the workshop.
Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Sections
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
COMMITTEE ON THE H5N1 AVIAN FLU VIRUS: HAS THE PARADIGM CHANGED
COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND LAW
BOARD ON LIFE SCIENCES
FORUM ON MICROBIAL THREATS
Acknowledgments
1. Introduction
2. The Quickening Pace of Biological Research and Current Challenges in Biosecurity
3. Influenza
4. Scientists and the Social Contract
5. Governance and Oversight
6. Moving Forward
Appendixes
PMID:
24901200
[PubMed]
Books & DocumentsFree full text
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901200
Editors
Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Life Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Forum on Microbial Threats; Board on Global Health; National Research Council; Institute of Medicine.
Source
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 Apr.
Excerpt
When, in late 2011, it became public knowledge that two research groups had submitted for publication manuscripts that reported on their work on mammalian transmissibility of a lethal H5N1 avian influenza strain, the information caused an international debate about the appropriateness and communication of the researchers' work, the risks associated with the work, partial or complete censorship of scientific publications, and dual-use research of concern in general. Recognizing that the H5N1 research is only the most recent scientific activity subject to widespread attention due to safety and security concerns, on May 1, 2012, the National Research Council's Committee on Science, Technology and Law, in conjunction with the Board on Life Sciences and the Institute of Medicine's Forum on Microbial Threats, convened a one-day public workshop for the purposes of 1) discussing the H5N1 controversy; 2) considering responses by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which had funded this research, the World Health Organization, the U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), scientific publishers, and members of the international research community; and 3) providing a forum wherein the concerns and interests of the broader community of stakeholders, including policy makers, biosafety and biosecurity experts, non-governmental organizations, international organizations, and the general public might be articulated. Perspectives on Research with H5N1 Avian Influenza: Scientific Enquiry, Communication, Controversy summarizes the proceedings of the workshop.
Copyright 2013 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Sections
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
COMMITTEE ON THE H5N1 AVIAN FLU VIRUS: HAS THE PARADIGM CHANGED
COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND LAW
BOARD ON LIFE SCIENCES
FORUM ON MICROBIAL THREATS
Acknowledgments
1. Introduction
2. The Quickening Pace of Biological Research and Current Challenges in Biosecurity
3. Influenza
4. Scientists and the Social Contract
5. Governance and Oversight
6. Moving Forward
Appendixes
PMID:
24901200
[PubMed]
Books & DocumentsFree full text
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901200