• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Performance of the Cobas(?) Influenza A/B Assay for Rapid Pcr-Based Detection of Influenza Compared to Prodesse ProFlu+ and Viral Culture

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
ur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2015 Dec 4;5(4):236-45. doi: 10.1556/1886.2015.00046. eCollection 2015. [h=1]Performance of the Cobas(?) Influenza A/B Assay for Rapid Pcr-Based Detection of Influenza Compared to Prodesse ProFlu+ and Viral Culture.[/h] Chen L[SUP]1[/SUP], Tian Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Chen S[SUP]1[/SUP], Liesenfeld O[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Rapid and accurate diagnosis of influenza is important for patient management and infection control. We determined the performance of the cobas(?) Influenza A/B assay, a rapid automated nucleic acid assay performed on the cobas(?) Liat System for qualitative detection of influenza A and influenza B from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens. Retrospective frozen and prospectively collected NP swabs from patients with signs and symptoms of influenza collected in universal transport medium (UTM) were tested at multiple sites including CLIA-waived sites using the cobas? Influenza A/B assay. Results were compared to the Prodesse Pro-Flu+ assay and to viral culture. Compared to the Prodesse ProFlu+ Assay, sensitivities of the cobas(?) Influenza A/B assay for influenza A and B were 97.7 and 98.6%, respectively; specificity was 99.2 and 99.4%. Compared to viral culture, the cobas(?) Influenza A/B assay showed sensitivities of 97.5 and 96.9% for influenza virus A and B, respectively; specificities were 97.9% for both viruses. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/sequencing showed that the majority of viral culture negative but cobas(?) Influenza A/B positive results were true positive results, indicating that the cobas(?) Influenza A/B assay has higher sensitivity compared to viral culture. In conclusion, the excellent accuracy, rapid time to result, and remarkable ease of use make the cobas(?) Influenza A/B nucleic acid assay for use on the cobas(?) Liat System a highly suitable point-of-care solution for the management of patients with suspected influenza A and B infection.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] PCR; diagnosis; influenza; influenza A; influenza B; point of care; sensitivity; viral culture

PMID: 26716012 [PubMed] PMCID: PMC4681351 Free PMC Article
 
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2015 Dec 4;5(4):233-5. doi: 10.1556/1886.2015.11111. eCollection 2015.
[h=1]Commentary On: Performance of the Cobas(?) Influenza A/B Assay for Rapid Pcr-Based Detection of Influenza Compared to Prodesse ProFlu+ and Viral Culture: Molecular Technology Poised to Change Testing for Influenza at the Point-of-Care.[/h] Rothman RE[SUP]1[/SUP], Sauer L[SUP]1[/SUP], Gaydos CA[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

PMID: 26716011 [PubMed] PMCID: PMC4681350 Free PMC Article
 
Back
Top Bottom