• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PeerJ . Development of a COVID-19 risk assessment model for participants at outdoor music festivals: evaluation of the validity and control measure

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PeerJ


. 2022 Aug 8;10:e13846.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.13846. eCollection 2022.
Development of a COVID-19 risk assessment model for participants at outdoor music festivals: evaluation of the validity and control measure effectiveness based on two actual events in Japan and Spain


Michio Murakami[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Tsukasa Fujita[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pinqi Li[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Seiya Imoto[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tetsuo Yasutaka[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

We developed an environmental exposure model to estimate the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk among participants at outdoor music festivals and validated the model using two real events-one in Japan (Event 1) and one in Spain (Event 2). Furthermore, we considered a hypothetical situation in which Event 1 was held but enhanced measures were implemented to evaluate the extent to which the risk could be reduced by additional infection control measures, such as negative antigen tests on the day of the event, wearing of masks, disinfection of environmental surfaces, and vaccination. Among 7,392 participants, the total number of already- and newly-infected individuals who participated in Event 1 according to the new model was 47.0 (95% uncertainty interval: 12.5-185.5), which is in good agreement with the reported value (45). The risk of infection at Event 2 (1.98 × 10[SUP]-2[/SUP]; 95% uncertainty interval: 0.55 × 10[SUP]-2[/SUP]-6.39 × 10[SUP]-2[/SUP]), calculated by the model in this study, was also similar to the estimated value in the previous epidemiological study (1.25 × 10[SUP]-2[/SUP]). These results for the two events in different countries highlighted the validity of the model. Among the additional control measures in the hypothetical Event 1, vaccination, mask-wearing, and disinfection of surfaces were determined to be effective. Based on the combination of all measures, a 94% risk reduction could be achieved. In addition to setting a benchmark for an acceptable number of newly-infected individuals at the time of an event, the application of this model will enable us to determine whether it is necessary to implement additional measures, limit the number of participants, or refrain from holding an event.

Keywords: COVID-19; Environmental exposure model; Infection control; Mass gatherings; Quantitative microbial risk assessment.
 
Back
Top Bottom