• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Pediatrics: Effect of a Single Inhalation of Laninamivir Octanoate in Children With Influenza

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pediatrics
(doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2054)


Effect of a Single Inhalation of Laninamivir Octanoate in Children With Influenza

Yoshiki Katsumi, MD, PhD,
Osamu Otabe, MD,
Fumihiro Matsui, MD, PhD,
Satoshi Kidowaki, MD,
Akiko Mibayashi, MD,
Yusuke Tsuma, MD, and
Hisato Ito, MD

Department of Pediatrics, Nantan General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency and safety of a new neuraminidase inhibitor, laninamivir octanoate (LO), with zanamivir (ZN) in pediatric patients with influenza.

METHODS: One hundred twelve pediatric patients ≤15 years, diagnosed with a rapid diagnostic test as having influenza from January to May 2011, were randomly assigned to the LO group or the ZN group, and their parents were asked to complete a questionnaire during the recovery at home. The LO group was instructed to inhale LO once (20 or 40 mg depending on age), and the ZN group was instructed to inhale ZN (20 mg) twice daily for 5 days.

RESULTS: The LO group (n = 55) and the ZN group (n = 57) were well balanced. Finally, 44 patients in the LO group and 41 patients in the ZN group could be evaluated. Median times to fever resolution after initial treatment were 36 hours in the LO group and 37 hours in the ZN group. No differences were observed between the 2 groups with respect to the frequencies of asthmatic symptoms, pneumonia, gastrointestinal symptoms, or abnormal behaviors. Six younger children could not inhale LO well for technical reasons.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the efficiency and safety of LO are the same as those of ZN in pediatric patients with influenza but that LO may be more convenient than ZN because it requires only a single inhalation. However, younger patients may not inhale LO efficiently.


http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2012/05/15/peds.2011-2054
 
Back
Top Bottom