• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Pediatr Qual Saf . Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pediatr Qual Saf


. 2021 Apr 5;6(2):e430.
doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000430. eCollection Mar-Apr 2021.
Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Model to Overcome Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy


Shannon H Baumer-Mouradian[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ashley Servi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Abigail Kleinschmidt[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mark Nimmer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kimberly Lazarevic[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Thomas Hanson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jena Jastrow[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Brian Jaworski[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Matthew Kopetsky[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Amy L Drendel[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy and delays in vaccine administration time have limited the success of prior influenza vaccination initiatives in the pediatric emergency department (ED). In 2018-2019, season 1, this ED implemented mandatory vaccine screening and offered the vaccine to all eligible patients; however, only 9% of the eligible population received the vaccine. In 2019-2020, season 2, the team sought to improve influenza vaccination rates from 9% to 15% and administer over 2,000 vaccines to eligible ED patients.
Methods: Key drivers included: identifying vaccine hesitancy, providing counseling, reducing administration delays, and developing reminders for vaccine administration. We tested interventions using plan-do-study-act cycles. We included discharged ED patients, age 6 months-18 years old, emergency severity index score 2-5, and no prior vaccine this season. Process measures included percent of patients screened, eligible, accepting the vaccine, and leaving before vaccination. Outcome measures were the percent of eligible patients vaccinated and the total number of vaccines administered. Vaccination time was the balancing measure.
Results: We included 57,804 children in this study. Comparing season 1 to 2, screening rates (84%) and eligibility rates (58%) were similar. Vaccine acceptance rates improved from 13% to 22%, the proportion of patients leaving before vaccination decreased from 32% to 17%, and vaccination rates improved from 9% to 20%. Total vaccines administered increased from 1,309 to 3,180, and vaccination time was 5 minutes faster in season 2.
Conclusions: This ED influenza vaccination process provides a model to overcome vaccine hesitancy and can be adapted and replicated for any vaccine-preventable illness.
 
Back
Top Bottom