• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Patterns of Evolution and Host Gene Mimicry in Influenza and Other RNA Viruses

mixin

Well-known member
Patterns of Evolution and Host Gene Mimicry in Influenza and Other RNA Viruses
Benjamin D. Greenbaum1, Arnold J. Levine2, Gyan Bhanot1,2, Raul Rabadan2*

1 BioMaPS Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America2 Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America

Abstract
It is well known that the dinucleotide CpG is under-represented in the genomic DNA of many vertebrates. This is commonly thought to be due to the methylation of cytosine residues in this dinucleotide and the corresponding high rate of deamination of 5-methycytosine, which lowers the frequency of this dinucleotide in DNA. Surprisingly, many single-stranded RNA viruses that replicate in these vertebrate hosts also have a very low presence of CpG dinucleotides in their genomes. Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites and the evolution of a virus is inexorably linked to the nature and fate of its host. One therefore expects that virus and host genomes should have common features. In this work, we compare evolutionary patterns in the genomes of ssRNA viruses and their hosts. In particular, we have analyzed dinucleotide patterns and found that the same patterns are pervasively over- or under-represented in many RNA viruses and their hosts suggesting that many RNA viruses evolve by mimicking some of the features of their host's genes (DNA) and likely also their corresponding mRNAs. When a virus crosses a species barrier into a different host, the pressure to replicate, survive and adapt, leaves a footprint in dinucleotide frequencies. For instance, since human genes seem to be under higher pressure to eliminate CpG dinucleotide motifs than avian genes, this pressure might be reflected in the genomes of human viruses (DNA and RNA viruses) when compared to those of the same viruses replicating in avian hosts. To test this idea we have analyzed the evolution of the influenza virus since 1918. We find that the influenza A virus, which originated from an avian reservoir and has been replicating in humans over many generations, evolves in a direction strongly selected to reduce the frequency of CpG dinucleotides in its genome. Consistent with this observation, we find that the influenza B virus, which has spent much more time in the human population, has adapted to its human host and exhibits an extremely low CpG dinucleotide content. We believe that these observations directly show that the evolution of RNA viral genomes can be shaped by pressures observed in the host genome. As a possible explanation, we suggest that the strong selection pressures acting on these RNA viruses are most likely related to the innate immune response and to nucleotide motifs in the host DNA and RNAs.

Author Summary
Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that use different strategies to sequester host cell machinery and avoid the host immune system. In this paper we explore the genomes of viruses that encode their genetic information in single-stranded RNA, a different material than the one used by their hosts (double-stranded DNA). It is interesting to observe that these viruses share some of the host's characteristics. For instance, one of the most underrepresented motifs in the DNA of vertebrates is the dinucleotide CpG. This is commonly thought to be due to methylation and deamination of cytosine residues in this dinucleotide. Surprisingly, the same CpG suppression is observed in vertebrate RNA viruses but not in RNA phages. We show that RNA viruses present similar dinucleotide pressures as their host genes. We find that the influenza A virus, which originated from an avian reservoir and replicated in humans over many generations, evolves to reduce the frequency of CpG dinucleotides mimicking the human genes. Influenza B, which has been in humans longer, exhibits an extremely low CpG dinucleotide content. These observations suggest that the evolution of RNA viruses is shaped by pressures observed in the host genome.

Full article here:
http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000079
 
Re: Patterns of Evolution and Host Gene Mimicry in Influenza and Other RNA Viruses

anyone here, who reads and understands such abstracts ?

if yes, posting a short summary with own words would be useful
I don't like these author summaries
 
Re: Patterns of Evolution and Host Gene Mimicry in Influenza and Other RNA Viruses

I think what they are saying is of the ACGT nucleotides that make up DNA the CG combination is statistically under represented in vertebrates. For some reason ssRNA viruses that infect vertebrates gradually also tend to exhibit the same CpG dinucleotide (the p in the middle denotes they are bonded with a phosphate bridge) paucity. Phages (viruses that infect bacteria) do not show low CpG occurence. Why?

"As a possible explanation, we suggest that the strong selection pressures acting on these RNA viruses are most likely related to the innate immune response and to nucleotide motifs in the host DNA and RNAs."
Their suggestion but I do not see how this is meant to work as the immune response - or at least the targeted part of the immune system B cells/anti bodies etc. - work on antigenic sites on proteins which are dependent of codons of 3 nucleotides (one of which is usually not significant).

An alternative explanation (the authors may not have considered if they are not recombination fans) is that short section copy choice errors involving sections of host, rather than viral, RNA will overtime incorporate less CpG combinations as they occur less frequently in the host.
The other point I did not understand is they say CpG is less common in vertebrates (rather than mammals) and yet they are correlating changes after a change in host species from avian to human but both vertebrates so both should have had a low CpG count anyway.

Guesses only I am layman not a biologist.
 
Re: Patterns of Evolution and Host Gene Mimicry in Influenza and Other RNA Viruses

hmm, interesting.
reminds me to the Rabadan et.al paper from 2006
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=33204
and my measurements of A,T as indicator for avian vs. human viruses.

Yes, these usually happens in 3rd bases of codons, no relevance for proteins,
but it's also observable to a lesser degree in 1st,2nd positions AFAIR.
And it's not observable in HA. And NP has in general few A,T no matter
matter of avian or human but avian even a bit less.

maybe birds are "less" vertebratious than humans ?

as I remember, the amount of A,T in swine viruses was almost
between that of humans and birds.



it doesn't seem that selection is responsible, but rather that G-A and T-C mutations
are somehow more frequent, are somehow preferred in humans.

Do we know, how/where the mutations happen ? Could be during replication in the nucleus,
but the segments are also walking from nucleus to membrane unprotected, I think.
Protected = encapsulated with the nucleopeptides

Can mutations happen, after assembling of the segment ?
 
Re: Patterns of Evolution and Host Gene Mimicry in Influenza and Other RNA Viruses

hmm, I didn't realize by first reading of mixin's post what this was about, that Rabadan
was co-author.

> It is well known that the dinucleotide CpG is under-represented in the genomic
> DNA of many vertebrates

not well known to me and I can't remember they mentioned it in the first paper in 2006

I haven't yet figured out, what a CpG dinucleotide is, but they mention
Arginine, which encodes as CGT,CGC,CGA,CGG,AGA,AGG

the first two nucleotides in the codon are C and G as in CpG in the first 4 encodings.


----edit1--------
...page3...
seems that they mean two consecutive codons with
C at position 3 and G at position 4 (from the 6).
(or vice versa ?)
but they also use the CpG notation for Arginine,
where C is at position 1 and G at position 2.

---edit2-------
thanks,JJackson.
So p stands for phosphate bridge.
maybe they mean any consecutive CG in the nucleotide chain or only those at specific
codon-positions - I can check the frequencies for either...

----edit3----
page 6 now.
Comparison with influenza B
shows also how humans are not important for influenza A and obviously dead ends.
I can't see that flu-A jumps back from humans to birds and continues to evolve in birds.
On the other hand human flu-A seems doomed to be eliminated by the next pandemic
virus.

------edit4----
.pdf,page 7, top left: why do they exclude nucleotide mutational biases ?

------edit5----
OK, I'm through it. I don't quite understand their favoured explanation
with the immune system
 
Re: Patterns of Evolution and Host Gene Mimicry in Influenza and Other RNA Viruses

see my updates above.

now I created a table for
human H1N1 since 2001,
human H3N2 since 2001,
and avian viruses,
segments 1,2,3,5,7,8
number of dicodons with A,C,G,T at position 3 (horizontal)
and A,C,G,T at position 4 (vertical)

first row/column is sum of the other 4

Code:
se7a1
H3N2
0139,3764,1605,3120,1509,
3701,1419,0555,1137,0588,
1785,0985,0367,0271,0160,
2258,0938,0180,0759,0379,
2254,0420,0501,0952,0380,

H1N1
0014,3787,1659,3091,1461,
3697,1404,0547,1111,0633,
1659,0889,0375,0165,0229,
2252,1002,0258,0726,0265,
2390,0491,0478,1087,0333,

Avian
2256,3666,1724,3196,1418,
3433,1286,0508,1095,0543,
1878,0882,0458,0286,0250,
2640,1090,0319,0884,0345,
2050,0404,0437,0928,0278,


se7a2
H3N2
0068,4018,1641,2707,1632,
3343,1466,0516,0830,0529,
2082,1015,0479,0203,0383,
2335,1007,0236,0722,0369,
2238,0528,0408,0951,0349,

H1N1
0075,3973,1518,2753,1754,
3273,1476,0396,0832,0567,
2029,1090,0447,0123,0366,
2065,0893,0264,0549,0358,
2632,0512,0410,1247,0461,

Avian
1952,4025,1686,2707,1582,
3281,1337,0502,0885,0553,
2089,1007,0447,0219,0414,
2478,1203,0322,0636,0315,
2155,0476,0413,0965,0298,


se7a3
H3N2
0104,3450,1578,3007,1963,
3161,1163,0487,0933,0576,
2163,1017,0373,0330,0442,
2363,0889,0323,0689,0460,
2311,0380,0394,1053,0483,

H1N1
0015,3442,1619,3020,1916,
3199,1260,0415,0899,0623,
1847,0912,0273,0267,0394,
2392,0869,0427,0713,0382,
2560,0400,0503,1139,0517,

Avian
1999,3375,1740,3047,1841,
3031,1041,0482,0857,0650,
2257,1004,0433,0332,0486,
2496,0976,0374,0770,0375,
2216,0352,0449,1084,0329,


se7a5
H3N2
0097,3604,1595,3205,1594,
3182,1307,0426,0974,0472,
1944,0833,0393,0357,0360,
2483,1129,0288,0723,0342,
2390,0334,0486,1148,0420,

H1N1
0016,3650,1588,3232,1529,
3158,1295,0457,1032,0373,
2151,1009,0410,0327,0403,
2353,1028,0305,0692,0325,
2337,0316,0414,1179,0426,

Avian
1664,3645,1759,3214,1383,
3024,1155,0413,1016,0435,
2083,0951,0451,0292,0385,
2570,1269,0322,0710,0267,
2328,0268,0570,1193,0293,


se7a7
H3N2
0297,3073,2200,3059,1666,
2637,1037,0532,0583,0484,
1778,0776,0322,0303,0376,
2668,0706,0613,1032,0315,
2916,0553,0731,1140,0490,

H1N1
0006,3186,2069,2926,1817,
2708,0950,0575,0604,0578,
1879,0776,0370,0355,0377,
2527,0747,0536,0909,0333,
2884,0712,0587,1056,0528,

Avian
0411,3051,2165,3080,1703,
2563,0872,0520,0742,0426,
1972,0891,0386,0332,0361,
2873,0784,0657,1014,0416,
2593,0502,0600,0990,0498,


se7a8
H3N2
0033,3691,1817,3001,1490,
3193,1227,0558,1078,0328,
1877,1016,0409,0181,0270,
2061,0876,0324,0630,0230,
2867,0570,0525,1111,0660,

H1N1
0002,3337,1705,3335,1621,
2950,1250,0420,0976,0302,
1908,0832,0423,0428,0223,
2134,0773,0293,0779,0287,
3006,0480,0567,1150,0808,

Avian
0284,3331,2010,3202,1467,
3205,1269,0547,1074,0313,
1908,0836,0471,0260,0339,
2039,0708,0322,0760,0236,
2860,0516,0658,1107,0576,


so, it's not just "CpG".



relative frequency (ratio*10000) of C at dicodon position 3 and
G at dicodon-position 4 in segments 1,2,3,5,7,8 of influenza-A:

Code:
  H3N2,H1N1,Avian,B
------------------
1:271,165,286,158
2:203,123,219,174
3:330,267,332,162
5:357,327,292,231
7:303,355,332,026
8:181,428,260,114


see e.g. for "ApA" :

relative frequency (ratio*10000) of A at dicodon position 3 and
A at dicodon-position 4 in segments 1,2,3,5,7,8 of influenza-A:

Code:
  H3N2,H1N1,Avian,B
------------------
1:1419,1404,1286,1604
2:1466,1476,1337,1838
3:1163,1260,1041,1526
5:1307,1295,1155,1524
7:1037,0950,0872,1392
8:1227,1250,1269,1453

these dicodon frequencies could just be a result of the smaller larger)
amount of C and G (A) nucleotides in total.
So, I'd just say : human flu tends to achieve more A- and T- nucleotides than avian.
This effect is somehow weakened in HA and there are differences in the other
segments but this may be explained by selection, different structures and tasks.




relative amount of A,C,G,T nucleotides
in influenza sequences from genbank 1.1.2008

Code:
  A     C     G     T   segment,type
------------------------------------------
 3470  1810  2444  2274 1,H3N2 since 2001
 3493  1790  2406  2308 1,H1N1 since 2001
 3352  1885  2583  2178 1,Avian
 3640  1734  2204  2419 1,B

 3561  1955  2274  2208 2,H3N2
 3510  1895  2212  2382 2,H1N1
 3531  1985  2321  2162 2,Avian
 3802  1555  2280  2361 2,B

 3397  1883  2343  2376 3,H3N2
 3382  1797  2378  2441 3,H1N1
 3298  1989  2422  2288 3,Avian
 3750  1546  2276  2426 3,B

 3250  1906  2679  2163 5,H3N2
 3235  1993  2640  2129 5,H1N1
 3153  1985  2768  2093 5,Avian
 3518  1955  2303  2223 5,B

 2839  2119  2633  2407 7,H3N2
 2915  2089  2569  2425 7,H1N1
 2802  2171  2701  2324 7,Avian
 3762  1661  2256  2320 7,B

 3326  1923  2335  2414 8,H3N2
 3096  1926  2476  2500 8,H1N1
 3183  2012  2411  2392 8,Avian
 3600  1786  2295  2317 8,B
------------------------------
 3307  1932  2451  2307  average,H3N2
 3271  1915  2446  2364  average,H1N1
 3219  2004  2534  2239  average,Avian
 3678  1706  2269  2344  average,B

                        


 3640  1734  2204  2419  1,B
 3802  1555  2280  2361  2,B
 3750  1546  2276  2426  3,B
 3463  2240  2108  2186  4,B
 3518  1955  2303  2223  5,B
 3275  1974  2262  2487  6,B
 3762  1661  2256  2320  7,B
 3600  1786  2295  2317  8,B
 
Back
Top