• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Participant centred safety surveillance of health care workers receiving influenza vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2019 Mar 28. pii: S0264-410X(19)30320-2. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.082. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Participant centred safety surveillance of health care workers receiving influenza vaccination.[/h] Cashman P[SUP]1[/SUP], Moberley S[SUP]2[/SUP], Chee K[SUP]3[/SUP], Stephenson J[SUP]2[/SUP], Chaverot S[SUP]3[/SUP], Martinelli J[SUP]2[/SUP], Gadsden T[SUP]4[/SUP], Bateman-Steel C[SUP]5[/SUP], Redwood L[SUP]3[/SUP], Howard Z[SUP]6[/SUP], Ferson MJ[SUP]7[/SUP], Durrheim DN[SUP]6[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Following the introduction of mandatory influenza vaccination for staff working in high risk clinical areas in 2018, we conducted active surveillance for adverse events following immunisation utilising an automated online survey to vaccine recipients at three and 42 days post immunisation. Most participants 2285 (92%) agreed to participate; 515 (32%) staff reported any symptom and eight (1.6%) sought medical attention. The odds of having a reaction decreased with age by approximately 2% per year. The system was acceptable to staff, and the data demonstrated rates of reported symptoms within expected rates for influenza vaccines from clinical trials. Rates of medical attendance were similar to previous surveillance. Participant centred real-time safety surveillance proved useful in this staff influenza vaccination context, providing reassurance with expected rates and profile of common adverse events following staff influenza vaccination.
Copyright ? 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Active surveillance; Adverse events following immunisation; Mandatory vaccination; Staff Health Services

PMID: 30930006 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.082
 
Back
Top Bottom