• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Parental attitudes affecting compliance with the recommendation for two doses of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in children less than 10 yea

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
W V Med J. 2013 Mar-Apr;109(2):10-4.
Parental attitudes affecting compliance with the recommendation for two doses of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine in children less than 10 years of age in West Virginia.
Gupta R, Alkhateeb FM, Latif DA, Farley KN.
Source

Kanawha-Charleston Health Department, Charleston, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:

It is unclear why parents would decline the second dose of an influenza vaccine for their children during a declared global pandemic. Therefore our objective was to examine parental attitudes behind parents foregoing the second dose of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine for their children in Kanawha County, WV.
METHOD:

A survey tool addressing barriers to receiving second dose was developed and validated with a randomly generated parent focus group. The West Virginia's Statewide Immunization Information System (WVSIIS) database listed 1,925 parents who have one child or more who received the first but not the second dose of vaccine within the recommended time period. The surveys and letters were sent to all the 1,925 parents. Participants were offered the choice of completing a paper version of the survey sent through the mail or an online version at a password-protected website.
RESULTS:

A total of 381 surveys were received (345 hardcopy surveys and 36 online surveys) and were included in the analyses (response rate 22.0%). Of these 381 respondents 249 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thus our effective response rate was 132/1525, or 8.66%. The major reasons for respondents being unable to have their child(ren) receive the second dose were related to access limitations. A perception of low urgency and safety of vaccine were other concerns. However, the majority of respondents (80%) did not cite safety concern as a reason for not accepting the second dose.
CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggest that rather than safety concerns, parents often faced access challenges in having their children fully vaccinated which were perhaps not widely recognized.

PMID:
23600099
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23600099
 
Back
Top Bottom