• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Pandemic influenza one year after the first wave: What did we learn?

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2010 Apr;27(2):144-7. Epub 2010 May 13.
[Pandemic influenza one year after the first wave: What did we learn?]

[Article in Spanish]

Perret P C.

Departamento de Pediatr?a, Pontificia Universidad Cat?lica de ChileChile.
Abstract

During year 2009 our nation experimented the first influenza pandemic wave due to the novel influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus that emerged in the Northern hemisphere at the end of April, 2009. Estimated attack rate was about 6 to 12% affecting mainly to schoolchildren who presented with a mild disease. Age groups with highest risk of hospitalization were elderly people and children under 5 years old. Elderly patients and patients with co-morbidities had the highest risk to die. We have learnt that clinical diagnosis of influenza has a laboratory confirmation in about 80% of cases but its correlation is lower in kids under 5 years old, especially in infants when RSV co-circulates with influenza virus. Laboratory diagnostic methods like DFA and immuno-cromatography have about 80% of sensitivity but a significantly lower rate in elderly patients compared to PCR. The clinical impact of this new virus justifies the recommendation to vaccinate traditionally established risk groups and to prescribe antiviral treatment to patients that acquire severe influenza or have risk factors to progress to complications.

PMID: 20556317 [PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20556317
 
Back
Top Bottom