• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Organic Farming Could, Maybe, Feed The World, Say Scientists

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
http://modernfarmer.com/2016/02/john-reganold-organic-agriculture/
[h=1]Organic Farming Could, Maybe, Feed The World, Say Scientists[/h] By Dan Nosowitz on February 5, 2016
It's been claimed before: Organic farming is a lark, a profitable process for a handful of farmers and an indulgence for a handful of consumers, a pie-in-the-sky dream that sounds nice but won't fly in our quest to feed the world. But a new survey suggests otherwise.
Previous studies have looked specifically at the cost or yield of organic farming, sometimes in specific countries, or at the cost of transitioning to an all-organic system. But this new survey?from John Reganold and Jonathan Wachter at Washington State University and published in February?s issue of Nature Plants?takes a more holistic view: It examines 40 years of studies to figure out if it would be possible to rejigger the system to feed the world with organic food...
 
merci,

il est s?r que les bases de l'agronomie et non plus l'agrologie, en oeuvre, dans bien des politiques publiques sont biais?es ou plus captieuses. Le probl?me de l'agiculture biologique , qui est, tr?s loin, de pratiquer ce qui se doit, est son lien avec des partis politiques.

Pour ?tre concret alors que les "intensifs" aux USA ont abandonn? le labour, pour la plus part, depuis longtemps , en France, en bio on se pose la question d'une part et d'autre part quand on ?voque le non labours on a presque droit ? une fatwa ...


Je pr?f?rerai des travaux neutres, donc peut ?tre en usant du concept d'agro?cologie ou d'un autre ...


Si je connais le sol, mon domaine d'expertise initial est l'animal: je suis au d?part v?to, et je peut en dire beaucoup sur le concept d'?levage bio ...


Pour ?tre concret et pr?cis, j'ai eu droit il y a 5 ans ? la d?monstration :



la gestion des puces chez les bios du Sud, en France:

la vue d'une gamine de 5 ans dont le corps ?tait couvert de piquures de puce et les propos des parents, des bios certifi?s : en grandissant cela ira mieux, m'ont outr? . J'ai ensuite d?couvert qu'elle ?tait loin d'?tre la seule et que tous les adultes , dont les enseignants ?taient complice.


Vu mes propos et mes actes, des choses ont chang? , mais les faits sont l?...
 
Back
Top