• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Opinion about seasonal influenza vaccination among the general population 3 years after the A(H1N1)pdm2009 influenza pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 28. pii: S0264-410X(15)01205-0. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.067. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Opinion about seasonal influenza vaccination among the general population 3 years after the A(H1N1)pdm2009 influenza pandemic.[/h] Boiron K[SUP]1[/SUP], Sarazin M[SUP]2[/SUP], Debin M[SUP]1[/SUP], Raude J[SUP]3[/SUP], Rossignol L[SUP]1[/SUP], Guerrisi C[SUP]1[/SUP], Odinkemelu D[SUP]1[/SUP], Hanslik T[SUP]4[/SUP], Colizza V[SUP]1[/SUP], Blanchon T[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] To assess the opinions of the French general population about seasonal influenza vaccination three years after the A(H1N1)pdm 09 pandemic and identify factors associated with a neutral or negative opinion about this vaccination.
[h=4]STUDY DESIGN:[/h] The study was conducted using data collected from 5374 participants during the 2012/2013 season of the GrippeNet.fr study. The opinion about seasonal influenza vaccination was studied on three levels ("positive", "negative" or "neutral"). The link between the participant's characteristics and their opinion regarding the seasonal influenza vaccination were studied using a multinomial logistic regression with categorical variables. The "positive" opinion was used as the reference for identifying individuals being at risk of having a "neutral" or a "negative" opinion.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Among the participants, 39% reported having a positive opinion about seasonal influenza vaccine, 39% a neutral opinion, and 22% a negative opinion. Factors associated with a neutral or negative opinion were young age, low educational level, lack of contact with sick or elderly individuals, lack of treatment for a chronic disease and taking a homeopathic preventive treatment.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] These results show that an important part of the French population does not have a positive opinion about influenza vaccination in France. Furthermore, it allows outlining the profiles of particularly reluctant individuals who could be targeted by informative campaigns.
Copyright ? 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Epidemiological factors; Influenza; Population surveillance; Vaccination

PMID: 26322844 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom