• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Open Forum Infect Dis . The Yield and Consistency of the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Multiple Respiratory Specimens

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis


. 2020 Aug 26;7(10):ofaa379.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa379. eCollection 2020 Oct.
The Yield and Consistency of the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Multiple Respiratory Specimens


Haixia Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Meiling Chen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yanhua Zhang[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Jing Wen[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Yajie Wang[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Liming Wang[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Jinjin Guo[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Chen Liu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Daijing Li[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Ying Wang[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Jing Bai[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Guiju Gao[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sa Wang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Di Yang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Fengting Yu[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Liting Yan[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Gang Wan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Fujie Zhang[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Few studies have compared the yield of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays in nasopharyngeal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, and sputum for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection.
Methods: We conducted an observational study in Beijing Ditan Hospital, China. Specimens including nasopharyngeal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs, and sputum from confirmed coronavirus 2019 patients were collected for RT-PCR testing. Disease duration was calculated from the date of symptom onset to the date of specimen collection and divided into 3 groups: ≤14 days, 14-21 days, and >21 days. We compared positive rates across the 3 specimens collected. The kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the consistency of RT-PCR results between different specimens.
Results: A total of 291 specimens were collected and tested from 43 confirmed patients. Among specimens collected with a disease duration of ≤14 days, the positive rate was highest in sputum (79.2%); this rate was significantly higher than that in nasopharyngeal swabs (37.5%; P = .003) and oropharyngeal swabs (20.8%; P < .001). Similar findings were observed with the disease durations of 14-21 days and >21 days. The consistency of testing results between nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs was low with the disease durations of ≤14 days and >21 days. The consistency between the sputum and oropharyngeal swabs and between the sputum and nasopharyngeal swabs was very low across all 3 disease durations, with statistical significance.
Conclusions: Compared with nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs, sputum had the highest yield of SARS-CoV-2 detection. Nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs had a similar yield. If sputum is not feasible, a nasopharyngeal swab can be recommended for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, and early testing is needed.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; nasopharyngeal swabs; oropharyngeal swabs; positive rate; sputum.
 
Back
Top Bottom