• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Open Forum Infect Dis . Association of Self-reported Systemic Reactions Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination With Immunological Response in the Danish N

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis


. 2023 May 8;10(6):ofad248.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad248. eCollection 2023 Jun. Association of Self-reported Systemic Reactions Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination With Immunological Response in the Danish National Cohort Study of Effectiveness and Safety of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines (ENFORCE)

Wendy P Bannister[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dorthe Raben[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Palle Valentiner-Branth[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Martin Tolstrup[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Lykke Larsen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Britta Tarp[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Mette Brouw Iversen[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ole Schmeltz Søgaard[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Sisse Rye Ostrowski[SUP] 8 9 [/SUP], Nina Breinholt Stærke[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Marie Louise Jakobsen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Susan Olaf Lindvig[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Maria Ruwald Juhl[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Isik Somuncu Johansen[SUP] 5 11 [/SUP], Ahmed B Mustafa[SUP] 8 12 [/SUP], Lars Østergaard[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Fredrikke Dam Larsen[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Lene Surland Knudsen[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Vibeke Klastrup[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lothar Wiese[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Thomas Benfield[SUP] 8 12 [/SUP], Kristine Toft Petersen[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Kasper K Iversen[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Henrik Nielsen[SUP] 10 14 [/SUP], Joanne Reekie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jens Lundgren[SUP] 1 8 [/SUP]; ENFORCE Study Group



Collaborators, Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Side effects to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are a key concern contributing to vaccine hesitancy, but more individuals may be encouraged if SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were known to lead to a stronger immune response.
Methods: Included were adult participants from the Danish National Cohort Study of Effectiveness and Safety of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines (ENFORCE) who completed a questionnaire to assess systemic reactions following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (BTN162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1) and had SARS-CoV-2 spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels measured at baseline and post-vaccine. A symptom score was developed to measure severity of systemic adverse reactions (+1 for each moderate, +2 for each severe). Post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG levels were compared between participants with different scores using multivariable linear regression.
Results: A total of 6528 participants were included (56.3% females; median age [interquartile range], 64 [54-75] years). After the first vaccination, no association was found between symptom score and post-vaccine dose spike IgG level (P = .575). Following the second vaccination, significantly higher spike IgG levels were observed according to higher symptom scores (P < .001); adjusted geometric mean ratios were 1.16 (95% CI, 1.04-1.30), 1.24 (95% CI, 1.09-1.41), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.06-1.46), and 1.21 (95% CI, 1.08-1.35), for scores of 2, 3, 4, and ≥5, respectively, compared with a score of 0. After adjustment for pre-vaccine dose spike IgG, this association was attenuated.
Conclusions: An association was found between more severe adverse reactions and stronger antibody response after the second vaccination but not the first, likely attributed to higher levels of preexisting immunity gained from response to first vaccination. Regardless of side effects, most people experienced an effective immune response following vaccination.

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccines; SARS-CoV-2; adverse drug reactions; antibody response.

 
Back
Top Bottom