• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

NPJ Vaccines . Maternal and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, a systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
NPJ Vaccines


. 2023 Jul 15;8(1):103.
doi: 10.1038/s41541-023-00698-8. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, a systematic review and meta-analysis

Greg Marchand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ahmed Taher Masoud[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Sandeep Grover[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Alexa King[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Giovanna Brazil[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hollie Ulibarri[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Julia Parise[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Amanda Arroyo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Catherine Coriell[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sydnee Goetz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Carmen Moir[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Malini Govindan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Atley Moberly[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anna Proctor[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Katelyn Sainz[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Richard Blumrick[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article Abstract

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with increased pregnancy complications. Despite effective vaccination strategies for the general population, the evidence on the safety and efficacy of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations in pregnancy is limited due to a lack of well-powered studies. The present study compares the maternal, neonatal, and immunological outcomes between vaccinated pregnant and unvaccinated pregnant women using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. We included 37 studies with a total of 141,107 pregnant women (36.8% vaccinated) spread across all outcomes. Our evidence indicates a higher rate of cesarean section in the 1898 vaccinated pregnant women compared to the 6180 women who did not receive vaccination (OR = 1.20, CI = (1.05, 1.38), P = 0.007, I2 = 45%). Regarding immunological outcomes, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy or postpartum was significantly reduced in 6820 vaccinated pregnant women compared to 17,010 unvaccinated pregnant women (OR = 0.25, CI = 0.13-0.48, P < 0.0001, I[SUP]2[/SUP] = 61%), as evident from qualitative assessment indicating significantly higher postpartum antibody titers compared to that observed in both unvaccinated mothers and mothers who have recently recovered from a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our analysis represents high quality evidence showing that COVID-19 vaccination effectively raises antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2. This may confer protection against infection during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In addition to being protective against SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine was associated with decreased odds of preterm delivery. Furthermore, COVID-19 vaccination may also be associated with higher odds of cesarean section.


 
Back
Top Bottom