• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

New Microbes New Infect . Are two consecutive negative RT-PCRs enough to rule out COVID-19?

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
New Microbes New Infect


. 2020 Aug 27;100750.
doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100750. Online ahead of print.
Are two consecutive negative RT-PCRs enough to rule out COVID-19?


Rami Waked[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jennifer Makhoul[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gebrael Saliba[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nabil Chehata[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sadek Mortada[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Antoine Zoghbi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jacques Choucair[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elie Haddad[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find an optimal SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of upper or lower respiratory tract secretions. The objective of this article is to demonstrate the importance of conducting RT-PCRs using deep sampling when initial upper respiratory testing is negative, in cases of high index of suspicion for COVID-19. We present the case of a 47-year-old man admitted for fever and bilateral pneumonia on chest CT scan, amid the early peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a SARS-CoV-2 infection. RT-PCR results done twice using nasopharyngeal swabs were negative. A bronchoscopy was then performed, and RT-PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage yielded positive results, confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. In conclusion, RT-PCR samples of the lower respiratory tract likely contain a higher viral load and thus retain a higher sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Pneumonia; Polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom