• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

New data from China buttress fears about high coronavirus fatality rate, WHO expert says

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: https://www.statnews.com/2020/02/25...gh-coronavirus-fatality-rate-who-expert-says/

New data from China buttress fears about high coronavirus fatality rate, WHO expert says
By Helen Branswell
February 25, 2020

One of the hopes of people watching China’s coronavirus outbreak was that the alarming picture of its lethality is probably exaggerated because a lot of mild cases are likely being missed.

But on Tuesday, a World Health Organization expert suggested that does not appear to be the case. Bruce Aylward, who led an international mission to China to learn about the virus and China’s response, said the specialists did not see evidence that a large number of mild cases of the novel disease called Covid-19 are evading detection.

“So I know everybody’s been out there saying, ‘Whoa, this thing is spreading everywhere and we just can’t see it, tip of the iceberg.’ But the data that we do have don’t support that,” Aylward said during a briefing for journalists at WHO’s Geneva headquarters.

Getting a handle on how many people have actually been infected is crucial to assessing how dangerous this virus is. During the early days of an explosive outbreak with a new pathogen, it is hugely challenging to look beyond the people streaming into hospitals for care to see whether there are many more at home with a mild cold or manageable flu-like illness.

If large numbers of mild or virtually symptom-free cases are evading detection, that would suggest that estimates of the proportion of people who might end up in ICUs or might die during a Covid-19 epidemic would be lower than what has been seen to date in China...

Read more: https://www.statnews.com/2020/02/25...gh-coronavirus-fatality-rate-who-expert-says/
 
thanks, but I have no youtube and don;t want to spend 2h , is there a transcript, a summary , blogpost, tweet , newspaper article , paper

--------edit-------------------
found this :
https://www.usnews.com/news/world/ar...-early-to-tell

better health care out of Wuhan ? more ELCO machines ?
missing of mild cases in Wuhan is again the argument that the headline of this thread wants to dismiss

from the CFR I'd conclude 5fold underreporting in Wuhan. One paper did put it at 19 by the
end of Jan. What additional new data has Aylward ?
Why are deaths not going up in China after the 3-weeks-delay ? Still ~40000 in hospital

here is a transcript , 26 pages .pdf
https://www.who.int/docs/default-so...ion-press-conference-script-english-final.pdf
 
Back
Top Bottom