• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

NEJM Evid . Human Challenge Trial of a Nucleoside-Modified Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Influenza Vaccine

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
NEJM Evid


. 2025 Nov 19:EVIDoa2500087.
doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500087. Online ahead of print. Human Challenge Trial of a Nucleoside-Modified Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Influenza Vaccine

Kelly A Lindert[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alex Mann[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anita Geevarughese[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Teresa Hauguel[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sarah Mirza[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Melissa Bevan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kevin Yi[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kayleigh Wolfe[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Pascale Nantermet[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kingsley Eze[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pratiksha Dokhe[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Agnieszka M Zareba[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Emily Gomme[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Andrew P Catchpole[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Annaliesa S Anderson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alejandra Gurtman[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pirada Suphaphiphat Allen[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Human challenge trials evaluate protection from influenza exposure following vaccination but have not been reported for nucleoside-modified messenger ribonucleic acid (modRNA) influenza vaccines.
Methods: This phase 2a, double-blind trial randomly assigned healthy adults 18-55 years of age in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a modRNA or quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) 30 days before an influenza A/H1N1 challenge. Control group participants from a separate trial were exposed to the same virus but were not vaccinated. Four primary efficacy end points were used to evaluate events from day 1 to 8 postchallenge. Two end points were the percentage of participants with laboratory-confirmed symptomatic influenza (grade 2 or higher) and the percentage with febrile influenza (with a temperature of at least 37.9°C). Influenza end points were compared between vaccine and control groups to calculate vaccine efficacy (VE [1 minus relative risk]). Two end points were the median differences between the vaccine and control groups for the area under the viral load (VL)-time curve (VL-AUC) and for peak VL. Vaccine safety end points were examined.
Results: The per-protocol cohort included 55, 48, and 52 participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively. Symptomatic influenza occurred in 0%, 4.2%, and 26.9% of participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively, with a VE of 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.2% to 100.0%) for the modRNA vaccine and 84.5% (95% CI, 43.4% to 96.0%) for the QIV. Febrile influenza occurred in 0%, 0%, and 17.3% of participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively, with a VE of 100.0% (95% CI, 61.2% to 100.0%) for the modRNA vaccine and 100.0% (95% CI, 55.9% to 100.0%) for the QIV. The median differences in the VL-AUC between the vaccine and control groups were -88.66 for the modRNA (95% CI, -261.95 to -1.35) and -67.01 for the QIV (95% CI, -254.13 to -0.97). The median differences in peak VL between the vaccine and control groups were -4.52 for the modRNA vaccine (95% CI, -5.29 to 0.00) and -1.49 for the QIV (95% CI, -5.25 to 0.00). No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: Following an influenza challenge, the modRNA vaccine was associated with greater VE and reduced VL compared with the control, without any serious adverse events. (Funded by hVIVO and Pfizer; clinical trial registration number, ISRCTN13789612.).


 
Back
Top Bottom