• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nature . Did flu come from fish? Genetics points to influenza's aquatic origin

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nature


. 2023 Feb 28.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00558-4. Online ahead of print.
Did flu come from fish? Genetics points to influenza's aquatic origin

Ewen Callaway

No abstract availableKeywords: Evolution; Genetics; Infection; Transcriptomics; Virology.
 
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2023/02/16/2023.02.15.528772.full.pdf

Evidence for an aquatic origin of influenza virus and the order Articulavirales
ME Petrone, R Parry, JCO Mifsud, K Van Brussel… - bioRxiv, 2023 - biorxiv.org
The emergence of novel disease-causing viruses in mammals is part of the long
evolutionary history of viruses. Tracing these evolutionary histories contextualises virus spill …
Speichern Zitieren Zitiert von: 2 Ähnliche Artikel Alle 2 Versionen



this is ridiculous. Holmes concludes that since influenza-like viruses
infects humans and corals, it must have existed before these host species
diverged in evolution.
But even current very similar viruses with a TMRCA of only some years
frequently infect hosts with a TMRCA of millions of years.

TMRCA = time of the most recent common ancestor

The important question in this sort of analysis -and the most natural question
to be asked in this context- is : what's the TMRCA of the involved genomes ?

Yet Holmes avoids to talk about this.
He does not give an estimate of the TMRCA ,
while TMRCA estimates were so essential and common to his previous
work end papers. Not even when asked at twitter.

Why ?
Is it maybe, because it won't support his theory, which jumps
from a few thousand years of viral evolution -which is all that have-
to 600 million years ?
All the rhetorik in the paper seems to aim at confusing the reader
about this giant leap in numbers. Not specifying them gives a
feeling -at best- of "small" and "big". This makes it easier
to draw unchallenged conclusions.

I think, it's the current scientific system that rewards the
emergence of such extraordinary claims.
But not the figuring out of the truth behind them.

> Articulavirales have evolved over at least 600M years ??
You would hardly have called these 600M-anchestors
"Articulavirales" by current standards.
Or even "virales" ?!?

Take the Wuhan Spiny Eel influenza virus.
Just calling it "influenza B" admits that it emerged
_after- the TMRCA of influenza A and B.
So, _after_ flu separated into A and B infecting
humans and birds. Just some thousand years ago.
 
TMRCA(A-subtypes)=2000y
TMRCA(A,B)=4000y
TMRCA(A,C)=8000y
Suzuki,2001

birds descend from dinosaurs, first normally flying birds maybe 50M years ago ?

The mallard complex radiated around the world in the last million years
(Johnson and Sorenson, 1999, Palmer, 1976).
Secondary contact between species pairs has resulted in relatively high rates
of introgressive hybridization, especially between the geographically
widespread mallard and the other species ( Rhymer and Simberloff, 1996 )

Most of the oldest known bat fossils were already very similar to modern
microbats, such as Archaeopteropus (32 million years ago).[7]
 
Back
Top