• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nat Med . Vaccine effectiveness of heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 in Brazil

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nat Med


. 2022 Feb 9.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01701-w. Online ahead of print.
Vaccine effectiveness of heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 in Brazil


Thiago Cerqueira-Silva[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Vinicius de Araujo Oliveira[SUP] 2 5 [/SUP], Renzo Flores-Ortiz[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Juracy Bertoldo Júnior[SUP] 2 5 [/SUP], Enny S Paixão[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Chris Robertson[SUP] 4 7 [/SUP], Gerson O Penna[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Guilherme L Werneck[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Maurício L Barreto[SUP] 2 5 [/SUP], Neil Pearce[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Aziz Sheikh[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Manoel Barral-Netto[SUP] 1 2 5 [/SUP], Viviane S Boaventura[SUP] 11 12 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the waning of effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and vaccine effectiveness (VE) of booster doses. Using linked national Brazilian databases, we undertook a test-negative design study involving almost 14 million people (~16 million tests) to estimate VE of CoronaVac over time and VE of BNT162b2 booster vaccination against RT-PCR-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalization or death). Compared with unvaccinated individuals, CoronaVac VE at 14-30 d after the second dose was 55.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 54.3-55.7) against confirmed infection and 82.1% (95% CI: 81.4-82.8) against severe outcomes. VE decreased to 34.7% (95% CI: 33.1-36.2) against infection and 72.5% (95% CI: 70.9-74.0) against severe outcomes over 180 d after the second dose. A BNT162b2 booster, 6 months after the second dose of CoronaVac, improved VE against infection to 92.7% (95% CI: 91.0-94.0) and VE against severe outcomes to 97.3% (95% CI: 96.1-98.1) 14-30 d after the booster. Compared with younger age groups, individuals 80 years of age or older had lower protection after the second dose but similar protection after the booster. Our findings support a BNT162b2 booster vaccine dose after two doses of CoronaVac, particularly for the elderly.
 
Back
Top Bottom