• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nat Commun . Immunogenicity and efficacy of fourth BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 COVID-19 vaccine doses; three months follow-up

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nat Commun


. 2022 Dec 13;13(1):7711.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35480-2.
Immunogenicity and efficacy of fourth BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 COVID-19 vaccine doses; three months follow-up


Michal Canetti[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Noam Barda[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP], Mayan Gilboa[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Victoria Indenbaum[SUP] 2 6 [/SUP], Michal Mandelboim[SUP] 2 6 [/SUP], Tal Gonen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Keren Asraf[SUP] 2 7 [/SUP], Yael Weiss-Ottolenghi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sharon Amit[SUP] 2 8 [/SUP], Ram Doolman[SUP] 2 7 [/SUP], Ella Mendelson[SUP] 2 6 [/SUP], Dror Harats[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Laurence S Freedman[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Yitshak Kreiss[SUP] 2 9 [/SUP], Yaniv Lustig[SUP] 2 6 11 [/SUP], Gili Regev-Yochay[SUP] 12 13 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Booster doses for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic are under consideration in many countries. We report a three-month follow-up of 700 participants in a fourth vaccine dose study, comparing BNT162b2 and mRNA1273, administered four months after a third BNT162b2 dose. The primary outcomes are the levels of IgG, neutralizing antibodies, and microneutralization and the secondary outcomes are the levels of IgA and T cell activation, and clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and substantial symptomatic disease. Waning of the immune response is evident during follow-up, with an 11% (β = 0.89, 95% CI, 0.88-0.9) and 21% (β = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.76-0.82) multiplicative decay per week of IgG and neutralizing antibodies, respectively, in the mRNA1273 group, and of 14% (β = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.86-0.87) and 26% (β = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.72-0.76), respectively, in the BNT162b2 group. Direct neutralization of Omicron variants is low relative to ancestral strains. Cumulatively over the study period, both vaccines show little efficacy against infection but were highly efficacious against substantial symptomatic disease [89% [(IRR 0.11, 95% CI, 0.02-0.37) and 71% (IRR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.13-0.57) for mRNA1273 and BNT162b2, respectively]. These results are informative for further boosting policy-making. Trial registration numbers (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT05231005 and NCT05230953.
 
Back
Top Bottom