• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Narrowing the policy gap: lessons from years 2 and 3 of the British Columbia influenza prevention policy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Jan 10:1-10. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1692561. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Narrowing the policy gap: lessons from years 2 and 3 of the British Columbia influenza prevention policy.[/h]
Di Castri AM[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Halperin DM[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], McPherson CM[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Nunn A[SUP]4[/SUP], Farrar-Muir H[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Kwong JC[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7,[/SUP][SUP]8,[/SUP][SUP]9,[/SUP][SUP]10,[/SUP][SUP]11[/SUP], Henry B[SUP]12,[/SUP][SUP]13[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Influenza can be potentially fatal to vulnerable populations, particularly those in the hospital. Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommends that health-care workers (HCW) be immunized against influenza partly to avoid infecting high-risk populations. However, influenza immunization rates among HCW remain suboptimal. In 2012, health authorities across British Columbia (B.C.) implemented a province-wide influenza prevention policy requiring HCW to either be immunized or wear a mask when in patient-care areas during the influenza season. This paper describes the second of two studies focused on what was learned from years 2 and 3 of the policy. A case study approach was used to examine this policy implementation event. Qualitative data were collected through key documents and key informant interviews with members of leadership teams responsible for policy implementation. Framework analysis and Prior's approach were used to analyze data from interviews and documents, respectively. Policy implementation varied by geographic region and gaps persist in immunization tracking and discipline for noncompliance. Debate regarding the scientific evidence used to support the policy fuels resistance from particular groups. Despite these challenges, findings suggest that the policy has been habituated, largely due to consistent policy objectives. This study emphasizes the importance of ongoing inter-professional and cross-sectoral program evaluation. While adherence may be routine for many, implementation processes must continue to respond to contextual issues to narrow the gap in policy implementation and to continue to engage stakeholders to ensure compliance.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] British Columbia; health personnel; immunization; influenza vaccines; policy; public health; vaccination

PMID: 31922460 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1692561
 
Back
Top Bottom